We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Presidential Inauguration Ceremony.

Presidential inauguration ceremony

Summary

The Taoiseach was satisfied with the ceremony’s content and style and would consider suggestions. He took responsibility for excluding spouses, explaining that St. Patrick’s Hall lacked space; he regretted the decision but rejected the claim that it insulted women.

andMr. Molony asked the Taoiseach if he will review the content and style of the Presidential inauguration ceremony, with a view to improving them.

Comment on this

I am satisfied with the content and style of the recent inauguration ceremony but any ideas which the Deputies may wish to offer will certainly be considered.

Comment on this

Will the Taoiseach state if he agrees with the decision of officials of his Department to exclude from the Presidential inauguration ceremony the wives of TDs, of dignitaries and international friends?

Comment on this

The decision was not a decision of officials but my decision and I take responsibility for it. I regret the necessity for it as I have strong views on the desirability of spouses being present whenever possible. However, in view of the accommodation situation in St. Patrick's Hall, as those present will know, it would not have been possible to accommodate the additional numbers that would have been involved if the spouses of those present had been invited. Therefore, there was no alternative to the course of action adopted, much though I personally regretted it.

Comment on this

Could not a more suitable location have been used to ensure that the women of this country were given the respect to which they are entitled? Further, would he not agree that what happened was an insult to the women of the country?

Comment on this

The spouses——

Comment on this

I do not agree it was an insult to the women of the country. It is a matter to be regretted that the accommodation did not make possible the presence of spouses, whether male or female.

Comment on this