We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Radioactivity Discharges.

Radioactive discharges and Paris Convention

Summary

Allen asked about the safety of radioactive discharges, ratification of the Paris Convention, and discussions with Britain. Collins said ratification would proceed promptly and cited surveys finding no contamination on east-coast beaches.

asked the Minister for Energy the assurances given by the Nuclear Energy Board that the amounts of radioactivity currently discharged into the Atlantic will have no harmful effects on man or his environment.

19.

Comment on this

asked the Minister for Energy when the Paris Convention which deals with the discharge of nuclear waste will be ratified; and the discussions that have taken place with Britain on the question of the dumping of nuclear waste in recent months.

Comment on this
Edward Collins Minister of State at the Department of Energy (Mr. E. Collins) Fine Gael

I am taking Questions Nos. 18 and 19 together. I understand that the Minister for the Environment will shortly present a motion to the Dáil seeking approval to the terms of the Paris Convention for the Prevention of Marine Pollution from Land Based Sources and that the process of ratification will then be concluded as quickly as possible.

Our concern about the discharge of radioactive effluent and the dumping of radioactive waste at sea has been made known to Britain on several occasions in recent months as well as to other participating countries to the Paris Convention and the London Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and other Matter.

On the occasion of the Anglo-Irish Summit in London, last year, the Tánaiste raised the matter of the discharges of radioactive effluent into the Irish Sea from the Windscale Plant at Sellafield with the Prime Minister and in December of last year the Minister for Labour, Deputy Quinn, while he was Minister of State at the Department of the Environment, had bilateral discussions on the matter in Brussels with his then opposite number in the UK, Mr. William Waldergrave, MP. The Deputy can be assured that Ireland's concerns on this issue are being pursued at the highest level.

On the question of dumping of radioactive waste at sea, as distinct from waste discharge to the sea, Ireland will be represented at the next meeting of the London Dumping Convention in February of this year and it is my intention to take this opportunity to make our continuing concern about the effects of dumping known.

The Nuclear Energy Board have assured me that there is no evidence to date that the dumping of low level radioactive waste into the north-east Atlantic in accordance with the Multilateral Consultation and Surveillance Mechanism operated by the Nuclear Energy Agency of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development presents a hazard in any way to our population or environment. Our concerns about this dumping are to ensure that no avoidable risk is taken that might cause a health or environmental hazard in the future. The Deputy will be aware that no dumping was carried out in 1983.

There are no discharges of nuclear wastes from land based sources directly into the Atlantic that I am aware of although discharges are taking place into the Irish Sea and the English Channel from two nuclear plants in the UK and France.

Comment on this

This seems to be a bit irrelevant today in view of what is happening in Cork, but the show must go on. I would like to ask the Minister to inform the House on what basis the Nuclear Energy Board gave assurances on a television programme that there would not be any damage to the environment or to man because of dumping from land based sources? My information from the annual reports of the Nuclear Energy Board is that the level of monitoring done by them is very inadequate. How dependent are we on information from British sources?

Comment on this
Edward Collins Mr. E. Collins Fine Gael

In relation to the Nuclear Energy Board, I want to state again in the House that I have confidence in that board and in their advice to me. I should point out that on two occasions, on 22 November 1983 and 23 December 1983, the Nuclear Energy Board carried out radiological surveys of east coast beaches to allay public concern about the reported incidents at Windscale. These surveys showed no evidence of contamination and this has been confirmed by laboratory analyses of the samples.

Comment on this