French President discussions and Private Notice Question
Noonan objected to the disallowance of his Private Notice Question seeking a report on the Taoiseach’s discussions with the French President. The Chair said the question did not meet the required criteria and that the ruling could not be challenged in the House.
(Limerick West): I am amazed that you have disallowed the Private Notice Question which I attempted to put to the Taoiseach. I wanted to ask for a report on his discussions yesterday with the French President. I am amazed you did not see fit, in view of the urgency and the importance——
Comment on this
The Chair is amazed that Deputy Noonan should raise the matter after I had explained the position so thoroughly to his colleague, Deputy Woods.
Comment on this
I asked nothing about the visit of the French Prime Minister or the urgency of it. I was referring to the urgency in regard to a statement by the Minister for Justice. The urgency is different in the two cases.
Comment on this
It appears to the Chair that there is a concerted effort to prevent the business of the House proceeding. If that develops I can take only one action.
Comment on this
(Limerick West): I do not think that is fair comment. I am not disorderly, but when a matter arises of such importance as a visit from the French President and I am not allowed to ask the Taoiseach to make a statement on it I think it is wrong.
Comment on this
When the Chair gets up Deputy Noonan should sit down. Deputy Noonan put a Private Notice Question through the General Office. It came to me in the ordinary way. I ruled on it, that it did not meet the criteria laid down for Private Notice Questions. That decision was conveyed to Deputy Noonan by my Private Secretary and it cannot and will not be questioned in the House.