Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Comhlucht Siúicre Éireann Teo.
- CSET funding and Tuam redundancies 10 speeches
The Minister said CSET receives no direct Exchequer allocation and declined to discuss company operations, citing its authority over spending and staffing. He noted that £50 million of the increased share capital had been taken up, while Kitt pressed for details of Tuam investment and savings.
Michael P. Kitt, Noel Treacy, Austin Deasy
- Disclosure of semi-state investment information 6 speeches
Wilson argued that semi-state companies drawing on public resources should disclose investment information to the House. The Minister said scrutiny remained available through the Joint Committee on State-Sponsored Bodies.
John P. Wilson, Thomas J. Fitzpatrick, Austin Deasy
- Tuam factory financing and staffing 5 speeches
Treacy asked whether Cabinet had made financing recommendations for Tuam and how planned savings would affect employment. The Minister said Cabinet made no factory-specific funding recommendation and left staffing decisions to the company board.
Noel Treacy, Austin Deasy, Thomas J. Fitzpatrick
- Replacing jobs lost at Tuam 2 speeches
Noonan asked whether the Minister had discussed replacing jobs lost through Tuam redundancies. The Minister referred the matter to the IDA and said he had advocated an additional factory there.
Michael J. Noonan, Austin Deasy
- CSET financial commitment to Tuam 4 speeches
Treacy sought the precise Government or CSET financial commitment to Tuam in 1984 and later years. The Minister said the company would decide how to spend its increased share capital.
Noel Treacy, Thomas J. Fitzpatrick, Austin Deasy
asked the Minister for Agriculture the amount of money that will be allocated to CSET this year, giving a breakdown of where the money will be spent.
4.
Comment on this
asked the Minister for Agriculture the amount of money allocated for Tuam sugar factory in 1984; if he will give details of any modernisation that will be undertaken in the factory in the coming year; the number of staff to be employed permanently in the factory in the coming year; and if he will make a statement on the matter.
5.
Comment on this
asked the Minister for Agriculture if he will make a statement on the proposed level of redundancies at Tuam sugar factory, County Galway.
Comment on this
I propose to take Questions Nos. 3 to 5, inclusive, together. Comhlucht Siúicre Éireann Teoranta are not in receipt of a direct Exchequer allocation. The other information requested relates to the detailed operations of the company which are a matter for the company itself.
Comment on this
Could the Minister tell us what money will be allocated to Comhlucht Siúicre Éireann this year and if there will be an investment in the Tuam sugar factory?
Comment on this
I cannot tell the House anything about the internal workings of the Sugar Company. That is a matter for the company and is recognised procedure in this House. The Sugar Manufacture (Amendment) Act, 1982, provided for an increase from £10 million to £75 million in the authorised share capital of the company. Of the extra £65 million, some £50 million has been taken up, including £20 million which was allocated on 21 December 1983.
Comment on this
Is the Minister aware that the chairman of CSET said in his report that it would be necessary to take appropriate steps to achieve substantial savings in the cost of operating the Tuam factory? Can the Minister say how this will be done in 1984?
Comment on this
Would the Minister agree that what has become established practice in the House, and which suited the circumstances of many semi-State bodies when they were making a profit, no longer obtains and that when there is a call on the resources of this House that internal information about investment by these companies should be available to the House and the taxpayer?
Comment on this
That facility is freely available through the Joint Committee on State-Sponsored Bodies. I was a member of that committee some years ago and we inquired into the affairs of the Sugar Company. That avenue is still open to Deputies and Senators.
Comment on this
Would the Minister agree that he considered a report which was presented to him by the Department of Agriculture and CSET about the Tuam sugar factory? Would he further agree that he was a member of the Cabinet when they made the decision to keep Tuam sugar factory open? Could he tell the House whether the Cabinet made any recommendation about financing for the Tuam sugar factory in 1984 or future years?
Comment on this
The Cabinet did not make any specific recommendations in relation to financing for individual sugar factories. We authorised the share capital to be increased by £20 million last December.
Comment on this
The Minister said that the Government decided that sugar processing would be continued in Tuam and we all welcome that. However, in view of what the chairman of CSET said concerning savings, would the Minister tell us what effect that will have on the level of the work force in Tuam?
Comment on this
(Limerick West): In view of the proposed level of redundancies at Tuam sugar factory, has the Minister discussed with the Minister for Industry, Trade, Commerce and Tourism ways to replace jobs lost?
Comment on this
That is a matter for the Industrial Development Authority. I have often expressed the view that it would be of considerable help if we got an additional factory in Tuam. However, the scale of redundancies is purely a matter for the board of the Sugar Company.
Comment on this
Is there any financial commitment either from the Government or CSET for Tuam sugar factory in 1984 and future years? What is the exact position?