Would the Minister like to say what obligation a veterinary inspector has in a meat factory towards the producer, seeing the producer has to pay the levy? Is there any obligation on the veterinary officer to ensure the rights of the producer?

One would hope that would be the case with or without a levy — that would not alter the situation.

Would the Minister go on record as saying that veterinary inspectors have an obligation to look after the rights of the producers?

That is a totally different question.

When there is a charge for a service there must be some right on the side of the person paying the charge.

Not necessarily.

I would dispute that judgment of the Chair. If a farmer who pays the levy asks a question of a veterinary officer about an animal and is insulted, that is a serious matter.

The Deputy seems to be asking the Minister to confirm something. That does not arise from the question and therefore the Minister would not be likely to have the information.

I am not quarrelling with the judgment of the Chair, but if a farmer pays a fee for a meat inspection is it not logical to expect that the person who is paid for doing the inspection has an obligation?

It may be, but the Chair's point is that it would require a specific question to get that information.

I have to accept that from the Chair.