An Post and the Private Notice Question
De Rossa objected to his Private Notice Question about alleged political interference with An Post and EEC postal votes being ruled non-urgent. The Chair said the ruling could not be challenged in that manner, suggested discussing it privately or moving a formal motion, and the exchange ended with a request to raise a matter on the Adjournment after time had expired.
On a point of order, I put down a Private Notice Question to the Minister for Communications which was ruled out of order on the grounds that it is not urgent. The question asked the Minister about political interference with An Post relating to EEC postal votes.
Comment on this
I considered that question fully and I conveyed my ruling to the Deputy. The Deputy will understand that my decision on the matter cannot be raised in the House in this manner.
Comment on this
I am raising the point on the grounds that it was ruled out of order on the basis that it is not urgent.
Comment on this
Deputy De Rossa or any other Deputy cannot question the ruling of the Chair in the House in this manner. That is the Chair's ruling. The Deputy has two options open to him. He can come and discuss it with me if he wishes, or he can put down a formal motion for discussion in the House censuring me, but he cannot come into the House and seek to raise an argument with the Chair.
Comment on this
I have no wish to censure you because I am sure you have made a correct decision in accordance with the rules of the House. I am making the point that there has been serious political interference with An Post. We sought to raise it and we are prevented from doing so by the rules of the House.
Comment on this
I will communicate with the Deputy but he has talked himself out of time on that one.