If the Taoiseach is a bit confused about what exactly he will say to the President in regard to emigration, could I ask him to make sure there is no doubt about two issues which I am sure he will discuss with the President.

This is a specific question.

I am asking a specific supplementary.

I will not allow a question——

You do not know what question I am about to ask.

You have made it pretty clear that it is not about the question in Deputy Begley's name.

You do not know what question I am about to ask.

The Chair is oversensitive.

Listen to my question and rule it out of order if it is not in order.

The Deputy has already told me that it is——

I did not.

Indirectly the Deputy told me. I will regard the Deputy as being disorderly if he puts a question which I have already ruled is out of order.

If my question is disorderly you can order me out of the House and I will go willingly.

It would be disorderly if it did not arise out of the question on the Order Paper.

It arises clearly from the question on the Order Paper.

Deputy Haughey started off by saying if the Taoiseach is uncertain about so-and-so will he make sure about two other things. That is the way the Deputy started.

I will withdraw those remarks and begin again.

Make a fresh start. It is never too late.

That was a clear indication to the Chair——

I will withdraw that preamble and relate my remarks directly to the question.

The Deputy may put a supplementary question arising out of this question, but if it does not arise out of this question it will not be in order.

And you will be very cross with me. Will the Taoiseach make certain that, in the course of the discussions referred to in Question No. 1, he asks President Reagan when he is addressing the House on Monday next to give a clear commitment to his acceptance of the report of the New Ireland Forum and particularly to the conclusion in paragraph 5.7?

That is clearly out of order. It is a separate question and I am ruling it out of order because of that.