Army participation in divisive celebrations
Treacy challenged the rejection of his urgent question about the Army’s proposed involvement in divisive celebrations on 11 November. The Chair said his general explanation applied to all the rejected questions and declined to elaborate.
I should like clarification of the position in regard to why the Private Notice Question I tabled concerning the involvement of our national Army in divisive celebrations was ruled out?
Comment on this
This matter is very urgent and important because the Army are supposed to be involved in these celebrations on 11 November.
Comment on this
I have given a general answer and I am not going to repeat it. I ask the Deputy to resume his seat.
Comment on this
Because of the amount of conflict about the whole position can we have some clarification?