We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Private Members' Time.

Allocation of Private Members’ Time

Summary

De Rossa pressed for fairer allocation rules and direct consultation with Independent and Workers’ Party Deputies, who cannot move Private Members’ motions. Bruton said proposals were before the Government and would normally go first to the Committee on Procedure and Privileges; he noted that group status affects privileges and said he was open to useful discussions.

asked the Minister for Industry, Trade, Commerce and Tourism the proposals he has for a fairer allocation of Private Members' time; and if he intends to discuss these proposals with all parties and independent Members in the Dáil.

Comment on this
John Bruton Mr. J. Bruton Fine Gael

The time allocated to Private Members is governed by the Dáil Standing Orders Nos. 82 to 86. However, the Government are considering the matter carefully as indicated in paragraph 3.90 of Building on Reality.

Comment on this

The question specifically asks the Minister what proposals he has for a fairer allocation of Private Members' Time. I understand he is the Minister responsible for Dáil reform. Does the Minister intend to discuss the question of a fairer allocation of Private Members' Time with Deputies other than Fianna Fáil Deputies?

Comment on this
John Bruton Mr. J. Bruton Fine Gael

I have been considering this matter in some detail. I have proposals which are before the Government at the moment for discussion and decision by the Government. It would be premature for me to give details of those proposals until such time as decisions have been taken.

Comment on this

Assuming the Government agree to the proposals, does the Minister propose to discuss them with Deputies including Independent Deputies and Deputies of The Workers' Party?

Comment on this
John Bruton Mr. J. Bruton Fine Gael

In the normal course, proposals of a procedural nature from the Government would be discussed in the first instance with the Committee on Procedure and Privileges. If the Deputy has views on this subject — and I appreciate that he is not a member of the Committee on Procedures and Privileges, as is the case with many other Deputies — I suggest that he should make his views known to the committee at the appropriate time. I have received submissions from the Deputy and I have discussed them with him already. I am aware of his views on this matter.

Comment on this

As the Minister stated, I am not a member of the Committee on Procedure and Privileges nor is any Independent Deputy so far as I am aware. It seems likely from the Minister's reply that the committee will decide on any reform of Private Members' Time. As Independent Deputies and Deputies of The Workers' Party are excluded from moving Private Members' motions, would the Minister not accept that he should discuss these proposals with these Deputies and with the Committee on Procedure and Privileges?

Comment on this
John Bruton Mr. J. Bruton Fine Gael

This is tied up with the question of forming a group. As the Deputy knows, a number of privileges attach to a group of seven members or more. I understand that at one stage Independent Members formed a group in conjunction with some smaller parties. That arrangement no longer obtains by, I understand, the decision of the people concerned, and not the decision of other parties in the House. Naturally I would not exclude discussions with anyone which I thought would be useful. I am sure the Deputy will acknowledge that I have been prepared to have discussions with him and with any other Member of the House who has views to express to me on this or any other matter relating to procedure. That continues to be the case. If the proposals are agreed by the Government in whatever form they are agreed by the Government, they will be made to the Committee on Procedure and Privileges who are the appropriate committee to deal with recommendations of this kind.

Comment on this