Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Trans-Boundary Air Pollution.
- Transboundary sulphur deposition in Ireland 2 speeches
The Minister said estimates showed 28% of sulphur deposition came from Irish sources, 30% from other EC countries, 3% from non-EC countries, with the remainder undetermined.
Gerard Brady, Fergus O'Brien
- Emissions from the Money-point plant 2 speeches
Brady urged action to prevent the plant’s emissions from polluting other countries. The Minister said Ireland produced less than 1% of emissions and warned that controls could impose heavy costs on industry.
Gerard Brady, Fergus O'Brien
- Sulphur pollution reaching Ireland from Britain 2 speeches
Shatter asked whether British emissions were damaging Ireland and whether contact had been made with Britain. The Minister cited the UK as the source of 18.8% of sulphur deposition in Ireland, but did not address contact directly.
Alan Shatter, Fergus O'Brien
asked the Minister for the Environment if he will approximate the percentage figure for transboundary air pollution to this country principally for acid rain and its components.
Comment on this
Information of the kind referred to in the question is available only in relation to the deposition of sulphur (dry and wet).
Data from the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) for the period from October 1980 to May 1981 and from March 1982 to November 1982 in relation to estimated emissions and depositions of sulphur shows that during that period some 28 per cent of the total deposition of sulphur in Ireland resulted from sources in Ireland. A further 30 per cent resulted from emissions in other EC countries; some 3 per cent resulted from emissions in non EC countries; and the source of 39 per cent of depositions was undetermined. These estimates are based on computer models designed to predict transboundary fluxes and depositions of sulphur throughout Europe. The work of updating sulphur emission inventories in the EMEP context is continuing.
Comment on this
It would appear that we obtain a sizeable amount of Trans-local pollution in the country. Should we not try to set an example to other European countries by not being seen as a country that would in effect subscribe to acid rain through prevailing winds to the Scandanavian countries and to Scotland? That is my point in talking about the Money-point plant. I ask the Minister to do all he can to ensure that emissions from that plant will not pollute other countries?
Comment on this
We are responsible for less than 1 per cent of the emissions. Our record is good. Very heavy cost factors are involved in this and one would not want to commit any industry to something that might have serious repercussions on other industries.
Comment on this
The Minister said he would deal with whether emissions from Ireland would give rise to acid rain. Are we being affected in the way it has been alleged other countries are being affected by emissions from Britain — apparently a number of Scandanavian countries are? Have we had contact with Britain about possible environmental damage to Ireland?
Comment on this
As I indicated in my reply, 30 per cent of the deposition of sulphur in Ireland resulted from emissions in other EC countries, 3 per cent from non-EC countries and 39 per cent has been undetermined. The figures are: Belgium, 1.6 per cent, France, 4.7 per cent, West Germany, 3.1 per cent, Ireland, 28.1 per cent, the Netherlands, 1.6 per cent, the UK, 18.8 per cent and other countries not in the EC, 3.1 per cent.