Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Royal Hospital, Kilmainham, Reception.
- Royal Hospital reception cost and purpose 12 speeches
The reception cost £2,378.80 and hosted 450 guests to mark the closing year of the UN Decade for Women. De Rossa questioned whether the money could better support women through publications or organisations; Fennell defended holding a formal reception and offered to circulate relevant publications.
Proinsias De Rossa, Nuala Fennell, Charles J. Haughey, Dick Spring, Gemma Hussey
- Women’s legislation and working-party report 9 speeches
De Rossa asked when promised legislation on legitimacy and women’s domicile, and the inter-departmental working-party report, would be available. Fennell and the Ceann Comhairle treated this as a separate question; no timetable was provided.
Proinsias De Rossa, Nuala Fennell, Thomas J. Fitzpatrick, Albert Reynolds
asked the Taoiseach the total cost of the reception hosted by the Minister of State at the Department of the Taoiseach at the Royal Hospital, Kilmainham, on 22 January last; the total number of guests who were present; the purpose of the reception; and if he will make a statement on the matter.
Comment on this
The total cost of catering for the State reception to which the Deputy refers amounted to £2,378.80 and the total number of guests who were present was 450.
The purpose of the reception was to mark the closing year of the United Nation's Decade for Women, which commenced after International Women's Year, 1975, and ends this year. The guests at the reception included a Government Minister; Ministers of State; Members of the Oireachtas; members of the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Women's Rights; members of the Diplomatic Corps; people from Northern Ireland; representatives from the Council for the Status of Women and from other women's groups not affiliated to the Council, such as the Ballymun Pre-School Playgroups Association; trade unionists and other representative groups and individuals drawn from the sub-themes of the decade, which are employment, health and education.
Comment on this
The Minister knows that I am a supporter in anything that she does to improve the status of women in this society of ours.
Comment on this
Does the Minister feel that the £2,300-odd which we spent on this reception could not have been spent more beneficially on some tangible publication for women or for some of the women's organisations which are in need of support?
Comment on this
I trust that the Deputy or the Deputies opposite are not inferring that because this event related to women's achievements, it should have been some kind of tea party and buns affair in some back kitchen, because that day is gone.
Comment on this
There are many publications coming out this year which will give assistance, support and advice to women. I should be very happy to circulate these to the House and the Deputy in question.
Comment on this
As the Minister spoke at the reception concerning various committees in which she is involved, could she indicate whether the legislation which she promised will be available shortly — for instance, legislation on legitimacy and on the domicile of women? Will these promises be met?
Comment on this
I am trying to establish that this reception must have had some purpose other than to get together. I presume its purpose was to announce some tangible——
Comment on this
——improvement in the status of women? I am asking the Minister of State if the Bill on legitimacy and that on the domicile of women and the report of the inter-departmental working party will be available shortly, or when any or all will be available.