DART performance and project costs
Deputy Faulkner praised DART’s ridership, efficiency and effect on congestion and defended its cost against the original estimate. The Minister acknowledged high passenger numbers but said they would need to double for the system to break even, with depreciation and financial charges adding costs.
Does the Minister agree that the DART system is working very satisfactorily in respect of the excellent numbers using the system, its speed and efficiency and the very satisfactory effect it has had on easing traffic congestion? Would he agree with Deputy Mac Giolla when he referred to it as the outstanding success of the Dublin area rapid transport system?
Comment on this
I may not be here when that question is being answered. The Minister referred to it so I am asking him a direct question as to whether he believes the system is working very satisfactorily in respect of the extra numbers using it, the speed and efficiency of the traffic on the line and the very worthwhile effect it has had on traffic congestion in the city?
Comment on this
The opening of the DART system has given CIE and the public a great lift. It costs a lot of money. I must criticise the way that was handled by my predecessors. it was approved by the then Government five weeks before the local elections in 1979 on a grant aid basis. Five weeks after the election it was changed to a loan basis.
Comment on this
It has achieved high passenger numbers, but it would need to double those numbers to break even. There are depreciation and financial charges, so it will cost CIE a lot of money.
Comment on this
Does the Minister agree that if he takes VAT, inflation and so on into consideration the cost of the new system worked out roughly the same as the original estimate?