We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Talks on Nicaragua.

Diplomatic and consular representation in Central America

Summary

Allen asked about establishing relations with Nicaragua and Central America. The Taoiseach said formal diplomatic ties were not planned because of cost, while honorary consular representation was under general review.

I will withdraw it, but I cannot understand how the same question could be allowed. Has the Taoiseach any plans at present to open up diplomatic relations with not only Nicaragua but the whole Central American region, even at consular level?

Comment on this

In certain countries we have honorary consuls, but there are no plans for diplomatic relations with the countries in question. There are financial constraints and limitations on the range of diplomatic relations that we can organise. We are not at present contemplating a move of that kind which would be costly in relation to that area.

Comment on this

Will the Taoiseach reconsider the position in relation to diplomatic relations since relations at consular level would not be too expensive for this country?

Comment on this

Let me make a distinction. There is consular representation, which does not constitute formal diplomatic relations. We have honorary consuls in various areas, and that is open to consideration. The question of our honorary consular representation is under active review at present, not particularly in that part of the world but generally. No doubt that review covers Central America, but I have no details of it.

Comment on this