Diplomatic relations with Nicaragua
Allen proposed diplomatic or consular ties with Nicaragua, alongside assistance. O’Keeffe cited the limited Irish presence and trade, the cost of diplomatic representation, and the distinction between consular and diplomatic functions.
Would the Minister agree that the steps now being taken by the United States administration threaten the very existence of the Nicaraguan administration and state? Would he not agree that the situation being brought about by the US sanctions is similar to the situation in which we found ourselves during the twenties and thirties when we were threatened by a far stronger neighbour? Would he consider that it would be an appropriate sign of support for the administration there if we set up some form of diplomatic relations with Nicaragua? We might consider development aid. All these things would be a sign of support by a small country in Europe for a similar small country in Central America.
Comment on this
I have already set out our views in regard to the solution to the problems in this region. We support the UN Security Council Resolution No. 562. and I have mentioned the various key points. Regarding diplomatic relations with Nicaragua, it is proper to point out that other considerations would have to arise.
Comment on this
There is a difference between diplomatic and consular functions. The consular function is to deal with consular problems, mainly related to Irish citizens in a particular country. My understanding is that the number of Irish citizens in Nicaragua is almost nil. A consular function also has something to do with trade but the trade between our two countries is very small. Regarding the diplomatic situation, the Deputy will be aware that cost factors are a major consideration. I recently had an opportunity of meeting the Vice-President of Nicaragua and I indicated to him that we had supported co-finance on projects in Nicaragua and that I would be open to further proposals in this area.