Negotiations and constitutional safeguards
Haughey criticised the talks’ length and secrecy, then sought an assurance that no agreement would undermine unity or the Constitution. The Taoiseach said the Government would do nothing contrary to the Constitution.
Is the Taoiseach aware that the unprecedented, long and protracted delay in conducting these matters has aroused a great deal of doubt, fear and suspicion in people's minds which have been accentuated by statements by him in which he uses gamblers' language about 50/50 chances? Is he aware that this is a most unsatisfactory and dangerous way of conducting the affairs of this nation? Will he acknowledge that these negotiations have gone on for so long that the normal precedent about retaining secrecy and confidentiality can no longer apply, that the situation now is such that he must inform the House, if not about what is taking place in the discussions, at least give us some assurances about what is not being discussed?
Comment on this
It is very difficult to reply to a negative question phrased so broadly. At least Deputy Mac Giolla asked a specific question. What is taking place in the negotiations is based on the Forum report. Our concern is to secure an outcome which would be in accord with and based on the principles set out in Chapter 5.2 which sets out the proposals of the report.
Comment on this
If the Taoiseach will not give me any information on that point perhaps he would give me a categoric assurance that, in the name of the Irish people, he will not agree to anything which would undermine Ireland's case for unity or which would be in conflict with the principles of national unity enshrined in our Constitution. It would not be disclosing any secrets or constitute a breach of any confidentiality if he were to give me that categoric assurance.