Industrial Relations Reform Legislation
The Minister outlined proposals to reform trade-dispute law and industrial relations institutions, including a Labour Relations Commission, and said consultations with employers and unions were continuing before a comprehensive package went to Government by year-end. Ahern asked about the Labour Court, trade-dispute law, union structures and timing; the Minister noted voluntary union-reform legislation was already available and rejected compulsory restructuring.
asked the Minister for Labour when he proposes to bring forward legislation to implement the proposals of the White Paper on industrial relations reform.
Comment on this
Outline proposals for the reform of industrial relations were published by my Department in March of this year. The proposals centred on two main areas: (1) the placing of trade dispute law on a new and more forward-looking basis by moving from a system of immunities to a system of positive rights; and (2) the reform of our industrial relations institutions notably through the establishment of a new Labour Relations Commission. Since March there has been a series of meetings with the Irish Congress of Trade Unions and the Federated Union of Employers at which these proposals were amplified and discussed in detail. This process is not yet complete. I am sure Deputies will appreciate how important it is to have the fullest possible consultation and consensus on the complex and wide-ranging issues involved. I would hope to be in a position to put a reform package before the Government before the end of this year.
Comment on this
I accept that there should be full consultation and negotiation prior to any announcement or the introduction of any legislation. Would the Minister indicate the present policy of his Department in relation to (1) the re-organisation of the Labour Court, (2) the amendment of the Trades Dispute Act, 1906, and (3) the incentives for reform of trade union structures?
Comment on this
The three items to which the Deputy referred are covered in the discussion document, a copy of which I understand he has received. Therefore, at this stage he knows what is the outline thinking of the Department which now forms the subject of detailed discussions on both sides. I have already indicated in my reply that, following the completion of those discussions and consultations, I shall be putting forward a comprehensive and integrated package of reform to the Government by the end of this year.
Comment on this
I think the Commission on Industrial Relations reported in 1981, that was the commission set up by my colleague, Deputy Gene Fitzgerald some years earlier. When is it expected that we may have legislation in the area of industrial relations reform?
Comment on this
Since the Deputy has referred to the commission of 1981 he will be aware also that it was a one-sided document in which the Irish Congress of Trade Unions refused to participate after the first few initial months and that that act alone highlighted the extraordinary difficulty that has surrounded this area for a number of years. I am proceeding with consultations with both sides in industry in a manner of which the Deputy is already aware and which I have already indicated to the House. I hope that the reform package which I shall bring to Government by the end of this year will result in legislation being introduced as soon as possible.
Comment on this
In view of recent statements by senior trade union leaders, following their annual congress conference, that one of their priorities was incentive for industrial relations reform and was something they desired, could that be treated as a separate package to assist them in their present difficulties?
Comment on this
I presume the Deputy is referring to the 1975 Trade Union Act already on the Statute Book and which is available to those trade unions who wish to avail of it voluntarily. I do not presume the Deputy is proposing that I should compulsorily impose reform of trade union structures.
Comment on this
I just wanted to ensure that that was not what the Opposition spokesman on Labour was suggesting.