We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna — Questions. Oral Answers. - Sanctions against South Africa.

Economic sanctions against South Africa

Summary

Members asked whether Ireland and the European Community should impose stronger economic sanctions. Barry reaffirmed the Government’s opposition to apartheid and desire for peaceful change, saying he favoured stronger Community and UN action but that the Twelve could not agree on further measures.

asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if the Government propose to exert pressure in international organisations to apply full economic sanctions against South Africa.

5.

Comment on this
Tomás Mac Gillla

asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if, in view of the deteriorating situation in South Africa, the increasingly repressive measures adopted by the Pretoria government, including mass arrests, the shooting of unarmed civilians and the execution of Benjamin Moloise, and the decision of many countries throughout the world to introduce new measures against South Africa, the Irish Government plan to take any new steps to increase the pressure on South Africa to abandon its policy of apartheid; if the Government will now introduce economic sanctions and, particularly, if they will ban the export of computer and electronic equipment to South Africa from Ireland; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

26.

Comment on this

asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the Government's view on economic sanctions against South Africa.

Comment on this
Peter Barry Minister for Foreign Affairs (Mr. P. Barry) Fine Gael

I propose to take Questions Nos. 4, 5 and 26 together.

I have stated many times, before this House and elsewhere, the Government's opposition to the abhorrence of the system of apartheid in South Africa. I would like to reaffirm this now as well as the Government's wish to see an end to the system by peaceful means and the emergence in South Africa in its place of a democratic and multi-racial society. The aim of Government policy is to seek to help bring this about by applying pressure on the Government of South Africa to persuade it to change its policies.

The Government consider that the imposition of effective mandatory sanctions against South Africa is a means of further increasing international pressure on South Africa to abandon its apartheid policies and to this end has supported proposals that the UN Security Council should consider such sanctions. In 1984 Ireland co-sponsored a resolution to this effect at the UN General Assembly and has previously co-sponsored resolutions urging the imposition of an oil embargo and a ban on new investment in South Africa. The Government believe that sanctions should be carefully chosen, graduated, properly imposed by the Security Council in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and fully implemented.

Within the European Community the Government have actively sought agreement among the Ten on common measures to be taken against South Africa. Agreement was reached on a number of such measures by the Foreign Ministers of the Community on 10 September last. These measures were not intended to be a substitute for sanctions or other stronger measures. The measures were regarded as a minimum and the Ten in their statement specifically referred to the fact that the question of other measures, including sanctions, remained on the table. The measures were designed to make clear, in unambiguous terms, the seriousness with which the Ten viewed the situation in South Africa and the need for the abolition of the apartheid system in that country and the opening of a genuine dialogue with the representatives of the black majority population.

I need hardly add that the Government keep the situation in South Africa under close scrutiny and that our policy with regard to finding ways of increasing pressure on South Africa to achieve peaceful change in that unfortunate country is kept constantly under review. In this connection, and with specific reference to Irish action at the United Nations, I wish to inform the House of the following additional steps which the Government propose taking in the matter:

(1) Ireland will work for international implementation of the measures recommended in Resolution 39/72G — the resolution we co-sponsored — on Concerted International Action Against Apartheid. This resolution calls for a cessation of further investment in and loans to South Africa, an end to all promotion of trade to South Africa, to all military and nuclear collaboration with South Africa and for further aid for victims of apartheid and those struggling to bring about a non-racial democratic society there.

(2) Ireland will work for strict compliance with Security Council Resolution 418 of 1977 which established a mandatory embargo on supplies of arms to South Africa.

(3) Ireland will work towards making mandatory the embargo on the import of arms and paramilitary equipment from South Africa set out in the provisions of Security Council Resolution 558 of 1984.

(4) Ireland will seek to have the provisions of Security Council Resolution 569 on the suspension of all new investment in South Africa and the suspension of guaranteed export loans to South Africa made mandatory.

The Government do not consider that a unilateral ban on trade with South Africa would be appropriate or effective. Such a ban could be in conflict with our treaty obligations arising out of our membership of the European Community and the GATT.

On the specific matter of a ban on exports of computers and electronic equipment, I would point out that the Government already take steps to ensure that no exports of this type go for the use of the South African security forces and that this was one of the measures agreed on by the Ten in September. The Government's view remains that, for pressure on South Africa to be effective, broad international agreement is required on measures such as the strengthening of the existing arms import embargo, the introduction of an oil embargo and a ban on new investment in South Africa. The Government will continue to seek international agreement on the adoption of such effective measures.

Comment on this

Does the Minister believe that the Community should and must take effective action to mark its abhorrence of the systematic killing of unarmed black civilians and the attempt to suppress international coverage of this in defence of a totally unjust and iniquitous system of government? Can the Minister possibly be satisfied with the Community's action and attitude to date? Would he agree it has been absolutely minimal and has been more designed to fend off public opinion in Europe than to effect any real change in South Africa?

Comment on this
Peter Barry Mr. P. Barry Fine Gael

The Deputy has asked three or four questions. I would wish that the Community and the UN would take stronger action against South Africa — I said that in my reply. It is not correct to say that the measures adopted by the Community on 10 September last were designed to fend off, as the Deputy said, public opinion. There was a basis on which we could get the Twelve to agree. I personally wish they could go further but at the moment there is no willingness among all members of the Community to go any further.

Comment on this