Conflict of Laws Reform Bill, 1985: Order for Second Stage.
No. 39 of 1985 ›
May I ask the Taoiseach if he would be willing to agree that the Bill be disposed of this week? I suggest that the Second Stage be taken this evening and the Committee Stage tomorrow. Would the Taoiseach be prepared to agree to that procedure? It is not a major piece of legislation, as my good friend Deputy John Kelly pointed out recently on the radio. It is a rather small, innocuous piece of legislation——
Comment on this
I know it is a matter for the Whips, but I am afraid we have not made much progress with the Whips. Therefore, through you, I am asking the Taoiseach who has final, ultimate, complete and total authority and responsibility in all these matters——
Comment on this
——to intervene with his recalcitrant Whip and allow this legislation to be dealt with reasonably expeditiously.
Comment on this
That does not arise. The Committee Stage does not arise until the Second Stage has been disposed of.
Comment on this
Standing Orders suggest that we take six hours to deal with this legislation. I suggest, through you, to the Taoiseach that six hours is not really necessary for the Second Stage.
Comment on this
Perhaps you and the Taoiseach could iron this out outside the House. It does not arise now.
Comment on this
It is very much on the Order of Business. If I cannot raise a matter like this on the Order of Business, I have not much hope of raising the Dublin bus strike. May I point out that Standing Orders provide that six hours be taken for the Second Stage? I want to suggest to the Taoiseach that we do not necessarily take that six hours because this is primarily a Committee Stage Bill. That is my point. It is a reasonable point. I am not suggesting sedition or the disruption of public order or anything of that nature. This is just a very simple little point of order on the Order of Business of the House.
Comment on this
I am totally in order. We are dealing with the Order of Business today and this is a piece of legislation on the Order of Business.
Comment on this
Things outside the House are of no concern to you and now the Order of Business in the House is of no concern to you. This is a piece of Private Members' legislation and you will not be——
Comment on this
There is public time and there is Private Members' Time and Private Members' Business is dealt with in Private Members' time.
Comment on this
It is almost impossible to get clarification of what exactly the order is in this House. Can you explain why a Private Notice Question that only arose because departmental officials rang fishermen yesterday saying the Minister had signed an order while their boats had put to sea, that they can no longer fish for mackerel, is not an urgent matter affecting the livelihood of thousands of people? You are preventing it being raised here and the Minister for Fisheries is not even here to deal with it. May I ask you to urge on the Government that the least the Minister for Fisheries or the Taoiseach should do is to let those thousands of families know what they are going to do now because already they are keeping them from their livelihood——
Comment on this
You should be proud of yourself, because what you were saying, in effect, is that you made your point in spite of the Chair.
Comment on this
I wish to raise the subject matter of the Private Notice Question on the Adjournment.
Comment on this
May I have your assistance in a small way? I want to express our concern at the large number of questions being transferred from one Department to another prior to Question Time. This is happening particularly to Priority Questions. Transfers are being made when it is too late for us to submit alternative Priority Questions. This is happening almost every sitting day and is causing a lot of problems for us on this side of the House. I would ask the Ceann Comhairle to do something about this, and perhaps the Taoiseach might comment, as it is obviously disrupting and destroying the whole process of the new Question Time and taking away its real meaning. Something will have to be done about it. The problem seems to lie with the various Departments who transfer questions at the twenty-third hour.
Comment on this
An order was made by the House providing for the new Question Time. That order still stands. If the Deputy is not satisfied with the order he should take steps——
Comment on this
There seems to be a concerted effort today to obstruct the Chair. Will the Deputy resume his seat?
Comment on this
The Deputy will resume his seat. My predecessors in this Chair have been saying for the last 40 years that they have no control over the transfer of questions and how questions are answered. I have never, since I came in here in 1965, seen an attempt such as the one being made now to saddle the Chair with that responsibility.
Comment on this
On a point of order, I raised this before and the Taoiseach graciously acknowledged that we had a point and undertook to look into it at the time. It is not something that we are raising to be disruptive or disorderly——
Comment on this
Surely the Chair must have some norm. What is happening is very simple and I genuinely think the Government do not intend it to happen. The system of priority questions is being negatived by the way questions are being transferred. The Taoiseach was sympathetic before on this point.
Comment on this
The Leader of the Opposition is perfectly correct in this. I had understood that the matter had been taken up between the Whips to see what, if any, changes could be made in the arrangements to avoid the difficulty raised by the Leader of the Opposition. Obviously there is a problem. Deputies on the Opposition side do not always choose the right Minister to whom to put questions and there is a need to transfer them from time to time. In Opposition we often had the problem as well. There is a timing constraint problem here which should be discussed between the Whips. I had hoped that this would have been taken up by the Fianna Fáil Whip with our Whip who is happy to discuss it.
Comment on this
On the Order of Business, and in order to try to ensure that a gross inaccuracy in describing a certain dispute in public transport as a strike, is corrected — there is no strike——
Comment on this
In support of my colleague. Deputy Michael Ahern, in what he raised, which is of serious concern in east Cork, I am appalled at the relaxed way in which the Minister for Justice sits in his seat without replying to Deputy Ahern's point——
Comment on this
Old people are living in fear in their homes in Cork and the Government are not prepared to do anything about it. It is an appalling situation where criminals and murderers are roaming the cities.