We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Libyan Exports and Imports.

Libyan exports and imports

Summary

The Taoiseach’s reply supplied available figures on Irish exports to and imports from Libya, including a provisional 1985 export total of £26.8 million. Shatter challenged the Chair’s ruling that supplementary questions could not follow written statements; the Chair upheld the ruling and suggested discussing it privately or changing the Standing Orders.

asked the Taoiseach the value of exports by this country to Libya in each of the years 1983, 1984 and 1985; the cost of Libyan imports to this country in each of the aforesaid years; and if he will state in respect of each of the said years to what items the imports and exports related.

Comment on this

(Dún Laoghaire): I propose to circulate a statement giving the available information.

Following is the statement:

Table 1—Exports (f.o.b.) to Libya £000

*Latest period for which detailed breakdown is available. The total value of exports to Libya in 1985 based on a provisional figure is £26.8 million.

Table 2—Imports (c.i.f.) from Libya £000.

*Provisional estimate.

Comment on this

Arising out of the Minister's reply, and with reference to the third part of the question, will the Minister confirm that the import——

Comment on this
Thomas J. Fitzpatrick An Ceann Comhairle Fine Gael

I should like to tell the Deputy that I have ruled quite strictly that supplementary questions are not appropriate on questions which are answered by a written statement and I cannot depart from that. I am sorry.

Comment on this

My understanding of the Chair's ruling was that supplementary questions were not appropriate where a statistical reply was involved. The information sought in the last part of my question does not come by way of statistics.

Comment on this
Thomas J. Fitzpatrick An Ceann Comhairle Fine Gael

My ruling covers written statements. It took me some time to get that accepted and I do not intend to depart from it.

Comment on this

As a matter of principle, I raise the issue and point out that it will create a situation in the House whereby a Minister could give a written reply to every question put to him and Members would not be able to put a supplementary question to him or her.

Comment on this
Deputies

Chair, Chair.

Comment on this
Thomas J. Fitzpatrick An Ceann Comhairle Fine Gael

I cannot allow Deputy Shatter to argue with the Chair.

Comment on this

The question I want to ask is not a matter of controversy but in relation to the general principle.

Comment on this
Thomas J. Fitzpatrick An Ceann Comhairle Fine Gael

There is a matter of principle involved here and I have ruled on it very strictly.

Comment on this

The Deputy would not understand that.

Comment on this

Am I right in understanding that in future if any Minister of any Government of any description gives a written answer to a question a Member cannot ask a supplementary question?

Comment on this
Thomas J. Fitzpatrick An Ceann Comhairle Fine Gael

The Deputy may come to my room and discuss the matter with me or have a new Standing Order written into the rule book.

Comment on this

It is a quite inappropriate way to deal with questions.

Comment on this
Thomas J. Fitzpatrick An Ceann Comhairle Fine Gael

The Deputy should not argue with the Chair.

Comment on this