Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Solicitors Act Amendment.
- Solicitors Act amendment 8 speeches
The Minister said a departmental review was nearing completion and proposals, including changes to disciplinary machinery, would then go to Government. He declined to anticipate whether the legislation would provide external arbitration.
Bernard Allen, Alan M. Dukes, Thomas J. Fitzpatrick
- Irish language requirement for solicitors 2 speeches
Mitchell asked whether the review would consider removing the Irish language requirement for solicitors qualifying in Northern Ireland; the Ceann Comhairle ruled it a separate matter.
Gay Mitchell, Thomas J. Fitzpatrick
- Solicitor complaints and disciplinary oversight 9 speeches
Deputies asked whether the Ombudsman or an independent body could investigate complaints, with the Minister noting that he had received representations reflecting similar concerns but declining to anticipate legislation. Taylor pointed to the Law Society’s scheme for negligence claims, prompting brief banter about complaints against other professions and TDs.
Bernard Allen, Alan M. Dukes, John F. O'Connell, Mervyn Taylor
asked the Minister for Justice when he intends to introduce legislation to amend the Solicitors Act, taking into consideration the urgency of the need for such an amendment in view of the level of discontent with and complaints against solicitors at the present time.
Comment on this
I expect that a review by my Department of the Solicitors Acts, 1954-1960, will be finalised soon and I intend to put proposals for amending legislation to Government in the usual way, after that, including proposals in relation to the disciplinary machinery for solicitors.
Comment on this
Let me ask the Minister if there have been special difficulties in bringing this legislation forward, taking into consideration the guarantee given two years ago that legislation would be brought forward immediately. Will the Minister agree that it is now very urgent to bring it forward immediately, considering the level of discontent with people protesting in the streets now at the manner in which the Incorporated Law Society deal with complaints from the public against solicitors?
Comment on this
There has been no special difficulty in bringing this legislation forward. Like my predecessor, I am concerned to make sure that the legislation when brought forward will deal as comprehensively as possible with the situation we are facing. As I have said, I hope to be in a position fairly soon to bring proposals for legislation before the Government.
Comment on this
Will the Minister agree then, that there is a need for an arbitration body outside the courts system since the public now find it so difficult to take cases against solicitors into the courts?
Comment on this
That is a matter which obviously falls to be considered in the preparation of legislation, but I do not want to anticipate today what I will put before the Government and the House.
Comment on this
Is it in order to ask the Minister if he will include in this examination the Irish language requirement for solicitors who qualify in Northern Ireland? Will he consider removing that requirement when he is updating the legislation?
Comment on this
Does the Minister see a role for the office of the Ombudsman in forthcoming legislation?
Comment on this
Answers in the positive or the negative are just as capable of anticipating legislation.
Comment on this
Will the Minister bear in mind that this self-regulatory body as at present in operation has been a failure? Will he bear in mind the need for an independent body to investigate complaints against solicitors?
Comment on this
I am sure that Deputy O'Connell is aware that a number of the representations and suggestions that have been made to me, my Department and my predecessor are inspired by the same kind of concern as he has just expressed.
Comment on this
Is the Minister aware that the law society have organised a scheme under which they will provide a solicitor for any member of the public who wishes to take an action for negligence against any member of the profession?