We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil

Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Grant Application.

asked the Minister for the Environment if an application from a person (details supplied) in Dublin 9 for a grant was considered by the Department before the recent decision was made to extend a number of grants to new amenities at community centres and sports clubs.

Comment on this

The application in question was not received in my Department until 14 October, 1986, after the announcement on the 13 October, of additional allocations under my Department's programme of assistance towards the provision of community, leisure and amenity facilities.

The application will be considered sympathetically and an early decision will be conveyed to the promoters in question.

Comment on this

Very recently a list of projects was published by the Government for special grants. Were these projects recommended to the Minister by Dublin Corporation or did the Department make their own decision? If so, on what basis was the decision made?

Comment on this

The decision was taken after consultation with the local authority.

Comment on this

I was informed of this by the Minister's Department and took the matter up with Dublin Corporation. That local authority advised me quite definitely that they did not make any recommendations to the Minister or to his Department on the applications which were awarded. That is the reason for my question. There seems to be some conflict of information from the Minister's Department and from Dublin Corporation.

Comment on this

There is no conflict at all. We had money available and consulted both local authorities, who made recommendations which we considered. We made grants where they were needed. We did consult the authorities on their opinion as to where the allotment of grants would be most suitable. We then considered that.

Comment on this

Did the Minister's Department follow the recommendations 100 per cent or were applications for projects which were not recommended by them chosen for grants?

Comment on this

These were only recommendations. As the Deputy is aware recommendations are something which can be accepted or rejected, but in 99 per cent of the cases they were accepted.

Comment on this

I must ask the Minister——

Comment on this
Thomas J. Fitzpatrick An Ceann Comhairle Fine Gael

This is the last question, Deputy. I am not going to allow another.

Comment on this

Were these recommendations made by Dublin Corporation, because Dublin Corporation have informed me quite positively, as recently as last Monday night, that no such recommendations were made by the local authority to the Department?

Comment on this

Dublin Corporation gave me a list of proposals on which they should like to see some funding. Not all were funded because there was not sufficient funding available, but the corporation did give a list of recommendations and of alternative recommendations. Most of their recommendations were followed.

Comment on this

Finally, could I ask the Minister——

Comment on this
Thomas J. Fitzpatrick An Ceann Comhairle Fine Gael

I shall allow this question.

Comment on this

With regard to the particular application to which I referred in my question, it obviously was not successful. Is it likely that that application could be successful in the near future in view of the fact that the project caters for somewhere in the region of 400 young people in that area? It is also being used as a community centre. There was an overdraft of £158,000 involved.

Comment on this
Thomas J. Fitzpatrick An Ceann Comhairle Fine Gael

The Chair does not recognise that as a question, Deputy.

Comment on this

It is a question plus information of which the Minister may not be completely aware. In view of those circumstances, is it likely that his Department will favourably consider that application in the near future?

Comment on this

I favourably consider every application.

Question No. 13 sent for written reply.

Comment on this