Might I ask whether the suppression of the name of the school in Question No. 18 and in another question on today's Order Paper represents a departure from existing policy? Heretofore it was only in personal matters that a name was not disclosed, and I assume it is the Department who change the form of the question.

Where a Deputy asks that details be supplied, we are happy to deal with a question in that way. We have no problems about giving full details if they are requested.

If I put down a question regarding Drung national school, with which the Minister is familiar, the name of the school would appear in the question. In this case, Deputy Gregory has a question relating to schools and I presume that the names were given. However, in the questions on the Order Paper such schools are anonymous.

That is a matter for the Deputy. We do not have any problems in that regard.

It is not a matter for the Deputy. The name of the school is usually given, otherwise the Minister would not know which school was being referred to.

In one of the questions the Deputy said "details supplied" which means he wanted the details kept private.

I do not think that is the case.

We must now proceed to the question nominated for priority today.