We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna — Questions. Oral Answers. - Army Accommodation.

Army accommodation

Summary

The Minister said military property was being reviewed, with surplus sites to be sold or transferred when vacated; the answer was cut off before explaining how proceeds would be used.

asked the Minister for Defence whether he intends to raise the necessary revenues to provide adequate, up-to-date accommodation for Army needs, by selling off existing, outdated buildings in his Department's ownership in Dublin and elsewhere; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

Comment on this

An ongoing review of military requirements for lands and premises was intensified in recent years with a view to identifying major items of property which could be disposed of as surplus to requirements. As a result, a number of surplus sites have been selected for disposal as soon as they can be vacated. Where these sites are vested in the Minister for Finance, they will be returned to the Commissioners for Public Works and the properties vested in me will be put up for sale by public advertisement, if they are not required by other Departments. Any moneys realised from sales would accrue to the Exchequer as appropriations-in-aid of the Vote for Defence or of the Vote for Public Works and Buildings. In any event, I am not at all certain from the investigations made so far that any worthwhile revenue will accrue from the sale of old military barracks.

I am well aware of the pressing needs of the Defence Forces for modern accommodation for living, administration, operations, storage and recreation. As the Minister said in this House when introducing the Estimates for Defence 1987, provision of £9 million has been made this year for the upkeep, renewal and replacement of premises. While this figure is an improvement on last year's provision, there is still need for further investment in the modernisation of our main military barracks or alternatively in the construction of modern replacements.

Comment on this