Defence Forces funding and duties
The Minister said the 1988 allocation of £253.009 million was adequate to maintain Defence Forces strength and meet commitments, including naval and rescue duties, but said environmental protection was for another Department. He defended a reduction in equipment spending as prudent purchasing; McCartan challenged the adequacy of provision.
asked the Minister for Defence the progress which has been made in implementing the commitment contained in the Fianna Fáil election programme to provide adequate resources for the Defence Forces to carry out their range of services, from fishery and environmental protection to naval and military duties and rescue missions; and if he will make a statement on the matter.
Comment on this
(Limerick West): On the basis of the allocation of £253,009,000 for Defence in 1988, I am satisfied that adequate financial resources have been provided to enable the Defence Forces to meet their commitments. The allocation should be sufficient to maintain the Defence Forces strengths at the same level as in 1987.
I shall make a further statement in the matter when I present the Estimate for Defence for discussion and approval by the Dáil.
Comment on this
In relation to the Government manifesto — to which this relates — am I correct in saying that they understood the armed forces to be responsible, in addition to fisheries, for environmental protection? Could the Minister advise the House whether resources have been made available, under current expenditure, for our armed forces to undertake duties in the area of environmental protection and, if so, what are those duties?
Comment on this
(Limerick West): I do not see any reference to duties of any environmental nature. That is a matter for another Government Department.
Comment on this
It relates to the question. I understand it is not appropriate to quote from documents at Question Time but I am sure the Minister is well aware that in the Fianna Fáil February manifesto they stressed the importance Ireland and its armed forces play in providing services for the protection of fisheries and environment since our accession to the EC. My question seeks to elicit information on what provisions have been made available to our armed forces for the protection of our fisheries and environment? What services have been made available? How have they been funded and what resources have been directed to the armed forces for that purpose?
Comment on this
(Limerick West): I take it the Deputy has in mind naval and military duties and rescue missions?
Comment on this
(Limerick West): I am satisfied that adequate provision was made in 1987 and that there is provision for adequate facilities incorporated in the 1988 Estimates to meet those commitments.
Comment on this
I have given the Deputy quite a lot of latitude. He has repeated his question three times over. It cannot go on interminably.
Comment on this
(Limerick West): If the Deputy will put down a separate question I will be glad to answer it. The Deputy asked whether the allocations were sufficient. I have answered that and I maintain they are sufficient.
Comment on this
Could the Minister advise the House how he considers adequate resources are being made available, for example, in the area of defence equipment when there has been a reduction of over 20 per cent in the current budget allocation in that area of responsibility alone? How can be justify that in view of his party's commitment cited in their February manifesto?