B & I viability and restructuring
The Minister described the agreed plan to restore B & I’s viability and the Government’s equity support. Deputies asked about workforce concessions, debts, expected losses and whether the Connacht would be sold; the Minister praised the unions, gave only tentative financial estimates and left the vessel decision to the restructured board.
asked the Minister for Tourism and Transport if he will make a statement on developments within B & I since he last reported to the Dáil on the matter; if a recommendation has yet been received from the board of the company; if a final decision has yet been made by the Government on the future of the company; and if he will make a statement on the matter.
16.
Comment on this
asked the Minister for Tourism and Transport the present position regarding the B & I shipping line.
17.
Comment on this
asked the Minister for Tourism and Transport the present position regarding the talks on the future of the B & I shipping line; and if the Government has satisfied itself that the company can operate on a self-financing basis.
30.
Comment on this
asked the Minister for Tourism and Transport his intentions in relation to B & I; whether he has intervened, or will intervene personally in the negotiations on the problems in the company; and if he will make a statement on the matter.
32.
Comment on this
asked the Minister for Tourism and Transport if he will outline the Government's plans to maintain a strategic State shipping operation for both passengers and cargo on the Irish Sea routes to and from Great Britain.
Comment on this
I propose to take Questions Nos. 14, 16, 17, 30 and 32 together. I welcome the opportunity presented by these question to inform the House of the action taken by the Government on Friday last in relation to the future of B & I. Deputies may recall that in May last I directed the board of the B & I to submit to me as soon as possible a plan of action, for implementation in the autumn, aimed at restoring the company to viability. I stressed to the board and to the B & I unions whom I also met at that time the necessity for an agreed plan. Additional equity was made available from the Exchequer to give the company time to produce the necessary plan.
In November the B & I board submitted a five-year plan of action to me which had been accepted by the majority of the company's workforce. The board informed me that they were unable to recommend implementation of the plan in the absence of agreement with the union representing marine officers. Subsequent further negotiations between the company's management and representatives of the marine officers culminated last Friday in acceptance by the marine officers of revised proposals which provided for the necessary contribution from that section of the workforce to the board's plan of action. The board of the B & I confirmed to me last Friday that their plan had now got the across-the-board support of the workforce and the board recommended the plan to Government for support.
Having noted the plan of action and its across-the-board support by the workforce the Government agreed, on the basis of the plan, to provide the company with up to £11 million in Exchequer equity in 1988. The Government also decided to review the position not later than the autumn of 1988 on the basis of detailed comparisons of the company's performance against forecast.
I emphasised in a statement last Friday and I repeat now that the company's future cannot be assured by Government support alone but is equally dependent on full co-operation by all concerned in the provision of a continuous, reliable and efficiet service. I recognise the significant concessions made by the company's workforce in agreeing the plan of action with B & I management and I trust that the combined efforts of board, management and staff will ensure that the new strategy of a slimmed down B & I will help the company to achieve a cost-efficient operation, to exploit new business opportunities and to provide the low cost shipping services required for the development of trade, tourism and general economic growth.
Comment on this
Will the Minister acknowledge that the concessions made by the B & I workforce are unprecedented and represent a major dimension in terms of the future of the company? Will he ensure, by way of reciprocation, that the Government give a very firm commitment, in the medium to long term, to the continued viability of this company?
Comment on this
I have already put on the record of this House my appreciation of the efforts made by the group of unions to reach agreement on a plan for a future viable B & I. I take this opportunity to reiterate what I said at that time. The second part of the Deputy's supplementary related to a commitment. In the severe financial circumstances obtaining at present I do not think there is any greater commitment than a Government decision allowing for the provision of this £11 million in equity for the B & I.
Comment on this
All Members of the House, I am sure, would like to compliment everybody concerned on this arrangement; common sense prevailed and a very mature attitude was adopted by the unions in particular. Can the Minister give us some idea of the extent of the debts hanging over the B & I shipping company at present? Can he confirm for us that the vessel The Connacht is being sold to pay for the resultant redundancies? Can he also inform us approximately what will be the losses of the B & I in the current year? Furthermore, can he give us the best possible estimate of those losses? Also, how does he envisage the losses working out for 1988? Does he feel that £11 million will be sufficient to carry the company over for 1988?
Comment on this
I appreciate what the Deputy has said about the mature attitude adopted by the unions. Off the top of my head I would say that the debts amount to something between £40 million and £50 million. It is difficult to assess what will be the losses for this year. In May 1987, when I put forward the original proposal to management and unions, the Government made provision for up to £8 million in equity of which £5 million has been drawn down as of this date. I could not give the Deputy a rounded figure for the losses in 1987. No doubt they will become available and I will supply them to the Deputy.
Comment on this
A figure of £14 million was mentioned. Will the Minister say, if that is in or about correct?
Comment on this
I have that figure in the back of my head but I am slightly cagey when answering questions lest I wander into inaccuracies.