We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Discussions with SDLP Leader.

Hume–Adams meeting

Summary

Mac Giolla questioned whether the Taoiseach knew of or approved John Hume’s meeting with Gerry Adams, what was discussed, and what benefit it might bring. The Taoiseach said no approval was required, trusted Hume’s judgment that the meeting was beneficial, and could promise no specific outcome; the Chair then moved to the next question.

asked the Taoiseach if he has had any discussions with the leader of the SDLP, Mr. John Hume, prior to Mr. Hume's meeting recently with Mr. Gerry Adams; if his approval was sought for this meeting; if his approval was given; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

Comment on this

I have meetings with representatives of the SDLP from time to time as part of the normal process of consultation on Government policy in relation to Northern Ireland.

I have the greatest respect for the integrity and judgment of the leader of the SDLP. The SDLP is an independent political party and no question of the kind of approval mentioned by the Deputy would arise.

Comment on this

Was the Taoiseach aware in advance that that meeting was to take place and, if so, will the Taoiseach say if he thinks the meeting was a good thing and what advantage may come from it?

Comment on this

I have complete confidence in the judgment of the leader of the SDLP and I am prepared to accept his assessment that such a meeting was beneficial.

Comment on this

If the Taoiseach is not prepared to state whether or not he knew about the meeting in advance, has he had a report from Mr. John Hume on the course of the meeting since the meeting and does the Taoiseach know whether or not it was advantageous? Since John Hume and Adams have both said that the question of a ceasefire, or as Adams says "the armed struggle", was not discussed, could the Taoiseach say what was discussed and if it will be beneficial?

Comment on this

Mr. John Hume, the leader of the SDLP has, I understand, briefed most of the political leaders in this House on the visit and has given an assessment——

Comment on this

Not me. Mr. Hume has not briefed me so can I share the briefing the Taoiseach got?

Comment on this

No. I suggest that if the Deputy wishes to have a briefing from John Hume he should seek a meeting with him. As far as I am concerned the leader of the SDLP has given a fairly widespread account to political leaders in the Republic on the meeting and his assessment of it, and the matter can be left to him at this point.

Comment on this
Seán Treacy An Ceann Comhairle Independent

Question No. 10 please.

Comment on this

The Taoiseach has not made any effort to answer my question or to reassure me as a Deputy in this House, which is the Taoiseach's job. I am specifically asking the Taoiseach what advantage he expects will accure to the people North and South as a result of this meeting?

Comment on this
Seán Treacy An Ceann Comhairle Independent

A question should not lead to repetition or argument.

Comment on this

I could not specifically assure the Deputy at this stage, nor would the leader of the SDLP attempt to say that there will be a particular advantage from the meeting. John Hume has frequently said that he is in the business of talking to people and that he is in the business of political discussion. As far as I am concerned, and as far as most people in this House are concerned, we would respect Mr. Hume's judgment in that area.

Comment on this
Seán Treacy An Ceann Comhairle Independent

Question No. 10.

Comment on this

Can I ask——

Comment on this
Seán Treacy An Ceann Comhairle Independent

Order. Question No. 10 has been called.

Comment on this

Can I ask a brief question?

Comment on this
Seán Treacy An Ceann Comhairle Independent

I have called the next question.

Comment on this