We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna — Questions. Oral Answers. - Disadvantaged Schools.

Disadvantaged school criteria and resources

Summary

The Minister said 168 schools had received support and that selection uses a range of educational, social and environmental factors, without requiring every criterion to be present. The exchange also addressed whether Circular 20/87 would affect staffing in disadvantaged schools.

asked the Minister for Education the number of schools which have been categorised as disadvantaged; the criteria used in classifying schools as disadvantaged; the additional resources which are made available to disadvantaged schools; and if the implementation of Circular 20/87 would affect the pupil-teacher ratio operating in disadvantaged schools.

Comment on this

A total of 168 schools have been assisted to date through a programme of special educational measures for schools serving disadvantaged areas for which a special fund was initiated in 1984.

In selecting schools to participate in the programme many educational, social and environmental factors are taken into account including the following: (1) high-levels of truancy and behaviour disorders; (2) discipline problems; (3) evidence of poor application, impaired reading and maths understanding; (4) home factors such as parental problems, poor quality of home life, lack of interest; (5) high unemployment and material poverty; (6) crime and vandalism; (7) lack of community support; and (8) poor standard of accommodation.

The main benefits which the individual schools receive through the programme are: (i) special grants for books-materials (ii) the sponsorship of home-school-community liaison initiatives (iii) in-service training for the teachers concerned (iv) provision of curricular materials and (v) the supply of educational assessment materials.

My Department also operates a scheme for providing additional teaching assistance to primary schools serving disadvantaged areas. A total of 79 schools throughout the country are included in this scheme at present.

In the allocation of posts, factors taken into account include the disavantaged nature of the area, the number of pupils and the level of staffing, and any particular problems or needs which may exist in each school.

I have already announced that existing remedial posts will not be affected by the changes under Circular 20/87, nor will special posts in disadvantaged areas.

Comment on this

Can the Minister tell me in the list of criteria which she mentioned for the selection of an area or a school in an area which would be deemed disadvantaged if all the items listed must exist? To what extent must an area be disadvantaged in order to qualify? While the Minister said in her reply that none of the special teacher assistance or remedial teachers will be affected by Circular 20/87, will the existing teaching staff in a school which is designated as being in an disadvantaged area be affected by Circular 20/87.

Comment on this

In regard to the first question, the eight criteria which were listed, which should be taken into account, are included in general. There is no specific blueprint as to whether the eight should be there or what element of the eight should be there. They are based on information furnished and on inspectors' and principals' reports and visits to the schools. They would not necessarily need to have the eight components but by and large they would include a majority of those in some shape or form depending on the region and the environmental factors. On the Deputy's second point relating to remedial posts in the disadvantaged areas, particular teachers would not be affected but normal staff posts in such schools would fall. Bearing in mind that the quota review is looking at each school, then that school would fall into that category too and it might be affected. The remedial, the disadvantaged and special posts would not fall to be disturbed; the others would be up for review.

Comment on this