CSO recruitment discrimination case
An employment equality officer found that the CSO discriminated against a married woman by prioritising applicants in economic need for 1986 census jobs. The Minister said the priority order was limited to that recruitment and had not been used since; the CSO was recruiting interviewers for a 1988 survey.
asked the Taoiseach in view of the decision of the employment equality officer in the case taken by the Employment Equality Agency on behalf of a person (details supplied) which found that the Central Statistics Office had discriminated against married women in the recruitment of field supervisors for the 1986 Census of Population, if the recruitment practices of the Central Statistics Office have been altered to take account of the verdict; and if he will make a statement on the matter.
Comment on this
In the case referred to by the Deputy, the equality officer concluded that because absolute priority for the jobs in question was given to persons in receipt of unemployment benefit or unemployment assistance or otherwise in economic need the CSO discriminated against the claimant contrary to certain provisions of the Employment Equality Act.
The equality officer also concluded that if the appointment had been on merit alone the claimant would not have been appointed.
The only recruitment presently being undertaken by the CSO is in respect of interviewers for the 1988 labour force survey. The procedure being followed is to offer appointments in order of merit, subject to location constraints, following competitive interview.
Comment on this
Will the Minister confirm that the order given by the Taoiseach's Department in the case of the census takers has not been issued with regard to the jobs now on offer? I refer to the order which stated that absolute preference would be accorded to those on unemployment benefit and unemployment assistance. Will the Minister confirm that this precondition no longer exists in relation to any jobs which the CSO are offering at the moment?