Ceisteanna — Questions Oral Answers. - National Development Corporation.
- NDC progress and productive investment 4 speeches
Sherlock sought figures on NDC projects, investment and jobs; the Minister referred him to annual reports rather than providing the figures. Mac Giolla also raised the case for borrowing for productive investment, which the Minister supported in principle but said depends on how “productive” is defined.
Joe Sherlock, Seamus Brennan, Tomás MacGiolla
- NDC role and sector investments 5 speeches
Bruton cited 750 jobs while challenging the suggestion that the NDC should be abolished, and asked about tourism and agricultural investments. The Minister said he would consider providing more detailed breakdowns but could not discuss current investments ahead of the corporation’s report.
John Bruton, Seamus Brennan
- NDC applications and annual estimate 4 speeches
Cullen asked how many applications the NDC had received, their value and whether the corporation would spend its £6 million estimate. The Minister said those details were a matter for the corporation.
Martin Cullen, Seamus Brennan
asked the Minister for Industry and Commerce if he will outline the progress made by the National Development Corporation since it was established; the number of projects the NDC has invested in; the total sum invested; the number of additional jobs created from this investment; and if he will make a statement on the matter.
Comment on this
Details of the progress and investment activities of the National Development Corporation Ltd. are provided in their annual reports. The 1986 report, which covered post balance sheet activities up to 14 May 1987 was laid before each House of the Oireachtas on 1 September 1987. I expect to receive the corporation's report for 1987 shortly and, as required by section 30 of the National Development Corporation Act, 1986, copies of that report will subsequently be laid before each House.
Comment on this
Are we not entitled to a reply to the simple question I put to the Minister in regard to the progress being made — the total sum invested, the number of projects invested in and the number of additional jobs created by the investment? The Minister referred to annual reports and said that a further one is due but we are asking simple questions which the Minister should be in a position to answer. Is the Minister aware of the ESRI report which pointed out that borrowing for productive investment is still justified? Does the Minister accept the statement of Dr. Owen O'Malley in that report?
Comment on this
I will take the last point first. Borrowing for productive purposes is always an attractive proposition. Unfortunately, very often the definition of "productive" is not agreed to by people; some people feel it is productive if you get an X rate of return; others feel it is productive if you get X jobs while others feel it is productive if you get X exports. The principle, as put forward by the Deputy, is that it is attractive to borrow for productive purposes. The difficulty arises in the definition of "productive" because it can and is increasingly becoming a very subjective phrase. I want to help the Deputy in regard to as many specifics as I can though I have some difficulty in this regard. Approved investments between June 1986 and May 1987 came to £6.2 million. Investments in that period totalled £5.7 million. The total number of employees in companies in which these investments were made is 750. At 14 May 1987, 29 companies were invested in. I can also inform the Deputy that there is a figure of £6 million in the 1988 Estimates of which £1.5 million has now been drawn down.
Comment on this
In view of the 750 jobs that have been created may I ask the Minister of State if he is still in agreement with the statement made by the Leader of his party, Deputy Haughey, when he said that this body should be abolished? Would he agree that perhaps, that was another example of a rather incautious statement by the Leader of his party which, gladly, he is now in a position to repent? Further, would the Minister of State indicate if the corporation have made any significant investments in regard to tourism or long term production contracts in the agricultural sector?
Would he further indicate if he would be prepared to ask the corporation that in future annual reports they give a breakdown of their investments by the listed functions that the corporation have been given individually in the Act rather than globally, so that one can see how they are implementing the individual parts of their statutory mandate?
Comment on this
There are three parts to the Deputy's question. The requirements of the Act are being met by way of the annual reports and the setting up of the corporation. I take it that the reports are fully in accordance with the Act. I shall bring to the attention of the NDC the Deputy's suggestion that there be more information given with regard to breakdown. I shall personally examine whether that is possible under the Act as it stands.
Comment on this
I had better examine it. With regard to tourism long term contracts, I am precluded from going into detail on current matters because the report of the National Development Corporation will shortly be due and it is their function under the Act to give that information, which I cannot now give.
Comment on this
The Minister of State is not going to eat the Taoiseach's words for him in the interests of the food Minister?
Comment on this
The Minister indicated that £1.5 million out of this year's Estimate was already committed. How many applications has he on his desk at the moment for the current year? Does the value of those applications exceed the Estimate of £6 million? Does he expect that all that was provided will be spent this year?
Comment on this
Is the Minister aware of the amount involved in the number of applications that have been received by the National Development Corporation?