We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna — Questions. Oral Answers. - Angling Tourism Revenue.

Angling tourism revenue losses

Summary

The Minister had no firm estimate of revenue lost because of the rod-licence controversy, but said angling tourism earned £32 million in 1986 and noted the salmon and trout seasons were underway. Deputies cited cancelled bookings and sought confirmation of losses and bailiff activity; the Minister reported anglers were arriving, while the Chair restricted discussion to the statistical questions and ruled bailiff matters outside the Minister’s remit.

asked the Minister for Tourism and Transport the amount of tourist revenue now expected to be lost as a consequence of the rod licence controversy.

21.

Comment on this

asked the Minister for Tourism and Transport if he will give an estimate of the tourism revenue lost to date arising out of the imposition of rod angling licence fees.

Comment on this

I propose to take Questions Nos. 12 and 21 together.

There are at this stage no firm estimates available of revenue from angling tourism either to date or for the year as a whole.

Comment on this

It is very strange, to say the least, that the Minister is not in a position to give estimates at present because the question has been tabled for four days, Bord Fáilte have had sufficient time in which to come up with some kind of an estimate and, furthermore, the dispute in the angling sector on account of the rod licence problem has been going on for some time. I had expected that the Minister would give a quantitative answer to the question on the Order Paper today. I find it very strange he is not in a position to do so. Is there no figure at all the Minister can give the House in terms of lost revenue accrued to date arising out of the imposition of the rod licence fee?

Comment on this

If the Deputy examined his statement I think he would find a lack of logic in it because it is precisely if nothing was happening to militate against the angling part of the tourism industry that one could give assessments but because there has been some trouble there is a difficulty in so assessing. That dictated the terms of my answer.

Comment on this

The hotel bookings that have been cancelled must surely be a basis on which it is possible for Bord Fáilte and the Minister to gather information of this kind. We know that hotel bookings have been cancelled at a phenomenal rate during the past several weeks because of the rod licence problem and that fact alone should have given the Minister a basis on which to produce statistics which would give an indication of the numbers of people who have failed to come who would otherwise have come and, consequently, give an estimate of the revenue that has been lost in the tourism area.

Comment on this

The only statistic I can give in that regard is that in 1986 we earned £32 million from angling tourism.

Comment on this

How far into the angling season are we at this point in time and, given that it has been very disrupted, is it likely that we have lost a large part of that revenue at this point of the season?

Comment on this

No, I would not agree with that.

Comment on this

I was just asking a question.

Comment on this

The salmon season started on 1 January but so far as trout angling is concerned, the mayfly, the real glory season, is in full swing at present.

Comment on this
Jim Mitchell Mr. J. Mitchell Fine Gael

A Ceann Comhairle——

Comment on this
Seán Treacy An Ceann Comhairle Independent

I want to call Deputy Pat McCartan.

Comment on this

Would the Minister agree that there are at least strong indications that considerable losses have occurred to date? Whether that can be redressed is another question. May I ask the Minister if the Tourism Task Force have in any way communicated to him on the problem and how the haemorrhage of losses of money might be rectified?

Comment on this

No, the Tourism Task Force got a specific brief, which is to advise my Department and Bord Fáilte on how the £4 million extra provided in the budget should be spent.

Comment on this

In relation to the first part of my question, would the Minister agree that there is at least an indication if nothing more?

Comment on this

The indications I have been getting for the past few days — and the Deputy can read this in the newspapers — are that the anglers are flooding in.

Comment on this
Jim Mitchell Mr. J. Mitchell Fine Gael

In relation to the loss of revenue, may I ask the Minister whether, if revenue was currently being collected, the bailiffs would be active on the lakes today?

Comment on this
Seán Treacy An Ceann Comhairle Independent

In relation to Questions Nos. 12 and 21, these are purely statistical questions and I cannot allow an expansion thereof, especially relating to a matter which is sub judice.

Comment on this
Jim Mitchell Mr. J. Mitchell Fine Gael

I am not——

Comment on this
Seán Treacy An Ceann Comhairle Independent

The Deputy may not argue with the Chair on that basis.

Comment on this
Jim Mitchell Mr. J. Mitchell Fine Gael

I do not wish to argue with the Chair; I want to ask a question in relation to the loss of revenue.

Comment on this

That is not my Department. That is the Department of the Marine.

Comment on this
Jim Mitchell Mr. J. Mitchell Fine Gael

The Minister was very eloquent on the radio on Saturday when he claimed that the bailiffs were active. Are they active today?

Comment on this
Seán Treacy An Ceann Comhairle Independent

We are dealing with statistics here and nothing else.

Comment on this
Jim Mitchell Mr. J. Mitchell Fine Gael

It is clear that the Minister is not going to mislead the House.

Comment on this
Seán Treacy An Ceann Comhairle Independent

Question No. 13, Deputy Austin Deasy's question.

Comment on this