Overrun on Priority Question 53
Bruton sought extra time for Question 53 after the preceding exchange ran over; the Chair declined to depart from the rules, while Bruton argued that public accountability required an answer in the House and the Minister said the answer was published.
On a point of order, while you were dealing with Deputy Sheehan's injured rights we ran over the time for Priority Question No. 53 so may I be allowed injury time to deal with it? The Minister is more than anxious to answer.
Comment on this
I was not aware that you were making these pleadings to Deputy Sheehan to allow us proceed with anything else. If the time has been reached we have to live in accordance with the rules and regulations.
Comment on this
I have no means by which I can see the inner workings of any Minister's mind and I am sure that even if I had he would appreciate that we must operate according to the rules. If there is general agreement throughout the House that something should happen I would agree, but the House appreciates that it is not wise to part from what is ordered and what the regulations are. I am sure Deputy Bruton would look forward to being entertained in the Minister's office where he might get more information than he would get here and allow us to proceed.
Comment on this
The question refers to public accountability, not to private accountability of the Minister. I do not think it would substitute——
