We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna-Questions. Oral Answers. - Transport Plan.

Road Funding and EC Grants

Summary

Deputy Griffin called for major road investment and asked whether Ireland would lose €21.2 million in EC grants because of insufficient budget allocation. The Ceann Comhairle cut off the exchange after repeated appeals for brevity; the Minister began to respond that Griffin’s figures were incorrect.

Would the Minister not agree with me that what is urgently needed now is a massive injection of funds for road development especially against the background that the Construction Industry Federation have indicated, that it would cost £2.6 billion to bring Irish roads up to EC standards? Would the Minister also confirm to the House that the Irish Government will not lose further EC grants——

Comment on this
Seán Treacy An Ceann Comhairle Independent

We are not having the brevity I appealed for.

Comment on this

——to the tune of £21.2 million in view of their non-allocation of sufficient funds in the 1988 budget?

Comment on this
Seán Treacy An Ceann Comhairle Independent

If that is the case I will move on to another question. I am calling Question No. 9.

Comment on this

A Cheann Comhairle, you are being very unfair.

Comment on this

That is disgraceful.

Comment on this
Seán Treacy An Ceann Comhairle Independent

In the light of the number of questions dealt with I must call the next question, No. 9.

Comment on this

A Cheann Comhairle, that was my first supplementary.

Comment on this
Seán Treacy An Ceann Comhairle Independent

I asked for brevity and the Deputy refused to respond to my request.

Comment on this

That is absolutely disgraceful.

Comment on this
Seán Treacy An Ceann Comhairle Independent

I asked for co-operation and did not get it.

Comment on this

I have something enlightening to tell the Deputy about the point he made; his figures are not correct.

Comment on this