IDA property sales and proceeds
The Minister said the IDA could choose which surplus land to sell and whether to use auction, public tender or private treaty, while meeting a Government revenue target. Mac Giolla questioned oversight and the price paid for East Wall land; the Minister said the IDA manages sales and offered to review details, while Cullen’s question about original purchase costs went unanswered.
asked the Minister for Industry and Commerce the guidelines which have been issued by his Department to the IDA regarding the sale of land or premises by the Authority; if the IDA has been requested to seek tenders when offering land or premises for sale; the total acreage of land and number of premises sold by the IDA since January 1988; the amount raised; and if he will make a statement on the matter.
Comment on this
As part of the general policy to restore order to the public finances the Government decided last year that the IDA could dispose of a portion of their large portfolio of land and buildings without unduly affecting the promotion of industrial development.
As the Authority are responsible for the day-to-day implementation of industrial policy it was felt that they would be in the best position to determine the most appropriate sites for disposal on a national basis and to decide whether such disposals should be carried out by way of public auction, public tender or private treaty in individual cases. I understand that the majority of sales to date have, in fact, been by way of auction or public tender. Since January of this year the authority have disposed of 27 sites — 816 acres — and two factories which have raised a total of £2.4 million. Additional revenues will be raised between now and year end on the basis of further property sales which have not yet been finalised.
Comment on this
May I ask the Minister if any monitoring is done of IDA sales and if he has had any indication that sales of land are being made at inordinately low prices? In his reply the Minister said that the sale of land is not unduly affecting industrial development. Is the Minister aware that land in the East Wall area which was desired by a number of people, including the short take-off airport, was sold by the IDA at what is considered to be the very cheap price of £5,000 an acre?
Comment on this
The question is in general terms. If the Deputy wants to raise a particular aspect of the matter he should put down a separate question.
Comment on this
As I have already stated, the Authority are responsible for the day-to-day management and implementation of industrial policy and they are in the best position to determine the most appropriate sites for disposal and how they dispose of them. As I have already said, the majority of sales to date have been by way of auction or public tender and I have no doubt that is what happened in this specific case.
Comment on this
The Authority are set a target by the Government at budget time, as was the case last year, to raise a certain amount of money for a contribution. Because they had 2,000,000 sq. ft. of factory space and a huge land bank they were instructed by the Government to dispose of a certain amount of that property to realise a certain figure. However, the IDA make their own decisions as to what to sell, how they sell it and what price they get for it. Those functions are part of the day-to-day operations of the IDA.
Comment on this
The Minister stated that the sale of 816 acres raised £2.4 million. As the Minister is well aware, when most of these land banks were purchased by the IDA land was at a premium price. May I ask the Minister the difference between the figure realised by the sale of this land and the actual purchase price paid by the IDA when it was originally bought?