We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - MMDS Leaflets.

Second bidder’s MMDS concerns

Summary

Cullen argued that the second television-service bidder withdrew over MMDS affordability and line-of-sight concerns. Burke countered that the remaining applicant had confidence in the system, before the Chair moved on to the next question.

Would the Minister not agree that one of the reasons the second bidder for the independent television channel pulled out was that they were not convinced about the MMDS system on two counts: firstly, it was going to be too expensive for the consumer and therefore they were not going to purchase it and secondly it would not be viable as a system which operates on line of sight. That was one of the main reasons those people pulled out of the bidding for the second television channel.

Comment on this
Ray Burke Mr. R. Burke Fianna Fáil

The Deputy's question clearly illustrates the difference between his party's approach to life and our party's approach to life. They are negative in everything they look at. I looked at the remaining applicant who clearly indicated that he had total confidence in the MMDS system.

Comment on this

To hell with the cost.

Comment on this
Ray Burke Mr. R. Burke Fianna Fáil

One of the bidders is totally confident and the other is negative, and in the usual fashion Deputy Cullen takes the negative——

Comment on this
Seán Treacy An Ceann Comhairle Independent

Question No. 34.

Comment on this

I wish to bring briefly to the Minister's attention——

Comment on this
Seán Treacy An Ceann Comhairle Independent

This is Question Time, Deputy Cullen. I am calling No. 34 in the name of Deputy Brendan Griffin.

Comment on this