Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - National Development Plan Projects.
- National Development Plan funding shortfall 18 speeches
The Minister said Ireland had been allocated £2.86 billion in EC Structural Funds, with a possible further share from the reserve. He rejected the claim that £1 billion of projects would be lost and said project details would follow Commission approval.
Michael Noonan, Alan M. Dukes, Proinsias De Rossa, Albert Reynolds, Seán Treacy
- Questions transferred from the Taoiseach 21 speeches
Deputy Barry objected that questions to the Taoiseach, including one about the Southern Health Board chief executive, had been transferred. The Ceann Comhairle said question transfers were a Cabinet matter, denied responsibility, and Barry withdrew after being asked to retract his allegations.
Peter Barry, Seán Treacy
- Export credit insurance cancellation 12 speeches
Deputy Barrett protested that his private notice question about the cancellation of £36 million in export credit cover had been refused as not urgent. The Ceann Comhairle said the matter was ongoing and Barrett could submit a question.
Seán Barrett, Seán Treacy, Tomás MacGiolla
- Question on Southern Health Board chief executive 6 speeches
Deputy Allen challenged the transfer of his question about an allegation that the Taoiseach directed the removal of the acting chief executive. The Ceann Comhairle said transfers were a Cabinet matter.
Bernard Allen, Seán Treacy
- Beef prices and private notice question 5 speeches
Deputy Connaughton objected that his private notice question on low beef prices had been disallowed, citing the impact on farmers. The Ceann Comhairle said he could raise it through the ordinary procedure.
Paul Connaughton, Seán Treacy
(Limerick East) asked the Minister for Finance the projects in the National Development Plan, submitted to the European Commission by the Government, which the Government intend dropping in view of the fact that the allocation of Structural Funds to Ireland by the Commission is £850 million less than the amount included in the plan.
50.
Comment on this
asked the Minister for Finance if the National Development Plan 1989-1993 published in March 1989 will be revised, in view of the fact that EC participation in funding the proposed programmes will be some £700 million less than the amount assumed by the Government at the time.
53.
Comment on this
asked the Minister for Finance the total amount of money applied for from EC Structural Funds under the Government's National Development Plan; the amount actually allocated; if he considers the amount adequate; and if he will make a statement on the matter.
Comment on this
I propose to take Questions Nos. 50 and 53 and Priority Question No. 57 together.
The National Development Plan 1989-1993 submitted to the European Commission in March last sought EC Structural Fund assistance of £3.7 billion. On 20 September last the Commission of the European Communities allocated a total of 36.2 billion ECU to the Objective I Regions of the European Community. Ireland's share of this initial allocation amounts to £2.86 billion. An allocation of a proportionate amount from the reserve retained by the Commission for Community initiatives would give Ireland an amount in excess of £3 billion which would be consistent with a doubling of our EC commitments by 1993. The Government will be seeking to maximise Ireland's share of the unallocated reserve.
Over the period 1989-93 Ireland will receive a higher level of EC aid per head of population than any other Objective I Region. Ireland will also achieve the highest per capita increase in aid over the 1987 levels. I am happy that the allocation made to Ireland will represent a major boost for our economic development prospects.
As the Deputies will be aware, discussions are now at an advanced stage on the completion of the Community Support Framework for Ireland. The Community Support Framework will set out the priorities included in the National Development Plan for which Community assistance will be given, the aggregate amount of assistance to be given annually through the three Structural Funds, the amount of assistance for each priority over the whole period and the form the assistance will take. Discussions are also taking place between the EC Commission and the various Government Departments in regard to the content of the national, sectoral Operational Programmes. At this early stage, it is not possible to predict exactly which individual projects will be selected for assistance until the negotiations on the Operational Programmes are concluded. The Community Support Framework will be published after it has been approved and will incorporate the revised expenditure and aid figures for the programmes included in the National Development Plan.
Comment on this
(Limerick East): I should like to thank the Minister for his reply and to ask him if he agrees that, on the best possible projection of unallocated reserve there will still be a shortfall of £700 million and that if we add to that the local contributions to the plan we are talking about projects to the value of £1 billion which will have to be dropped from the plan. When will the Minister be in a position to give us details of the projects to the value of £1 billion which will be dropped from the National Development Plan?
Comment on this
First, I totally reject the Deputy's insinuation about £1 billion worth of projects being lost. He is coming at it the wrong way around.
Comment on this
Secondly, the details will be available and published when the operational projects have been approved——
Comment on this
As soon as they are approved by the Commission. Then the Deputy will have all the details and we will all know——
Comment on this
It is a strange development in this country that when we get over £3 billion which we do not have to repay to the EC, people try to say we left money behind us.
Comment on this
We did not leave that much behind us. A sum of 48 billion ECU's in aid was sought but there was a finite figure of 38 billion ECU's.
Comment on this
I want to raise the matter of some questions I put down to the Taoiseach. If you will bear with me, you will see the point I am trying to make. I asked the Taoiseach if the Government had any plans to commemorate the Battle of the Boyne. I also asked if he was meeting relatives of those people shot in Gibraltar and helping them with legal action in the European Court and whether he would make a statement in that regard. I asked if he had instructed the Secretary of the Department of Health to ask the acting chief executive officer of the Southern Health Board to resign. I asked——
Comment on this
The Deputy will have ample time to raise those questions but he must proceed in the ordinary way in dealing with the matter.
Comment on this
I am not, Sir, if you will bear with me. You transferred these questions from the Taoiseach but they are clearly within his knowledge to answer.
Comment on this
It is a matter for the House of the Oireachtas for which you are responsible. You transferred those questions from the Taoiseach, although he clearly has a responsibility to answer them in this House.
Comment on this
Then why did you write to me? You are responsible for the office of the House of the Oireachtas and I will not tolerate the Taoiseach being protected in this manner in the future.
Comment on this
That is what makes me so cross about what has happened. It has not previously happened in my 20 years here.
Comment on this
You have made allegations against the Chair which are utterly unfounded. I would ask you to reconsider your position. What you allege against me is completely untrue and unfounded. It cannot be substantiated. I must ask that it be withdrawn.
Comment on this
You are responsible for the House of the Oireachtas and for transferring those questions.
Comment on this
I repeat that this has never been a function of the Ceann Comhairle of this House. The allegation you are making is unfounded and untrue. Be man enough to withdraw or leave the House.
Comment on this
I will certainly do that. I object vigorously to what has happened in this House recently.
Deputy Barry withdrew from the Chamber.
Comment on this
I would ask why you refused a private notice question to the Minister for Industry and Commerce in relation to the cancellation of export credit insurance on the grounds that it is not urgent. Could anybody tell me how the cancellation of £36 million worth of cover is not urgent?
Comment on this
Deputy Barrett has had a reply from me in connection with this matter. He can put down a question.
Comment on this
What is urgent? All over the Eastern Bloc they are having democracy in their systems but in this House we cannot even ask a question.
Comment on this
The matter to which Deputy Barrett refers has been ongoing for a considerable time. He had ample opportunity to put down a question on this matter but failed to do so. He may yet put down a question but it is quite disorderly to raise it now.
Comment on this
Deputy Barrett must leave the House. I have told the Deputy that the matter to which he refers is not urgent. It is of an ongoing nature. He might have put down a question last week and this question would have come up today. He failed to do so, yet he kicks up a row today which is quite unjustified.
Comment on this
You disallowed a question put by me to the Taoiseach relating to allegations made in Cork by a former acting chief executive officer of the health board that the Taoiseach instructed his removal from the post. I would ask why the Taoiseach has refused to answer that question.
Comment on this
I put down a question asking the Taoiseach to answer an allegation but the question has been transferred to the Minister for Health.
Comment on this
It is a matter for the Cabinet to transfer questions. That has always been the position. Deputy Barry knows that, too.
Comment on this
Why was my private notice question to the Minister for Agriculture and Food regarding the beef prices disallowed? What could be more critical or crucial than this matter, which is affecting thousands of Irish farmers this very day yet I cannot get the chance to raise it on the Floor of Dáil Éireann?