Order of Business.
It is proposed to take item No. 15. It is also proposed that, at the conclusion of business today, the Dáil shall adjourn until 12 noon on Tuesday, 10 December 1991.
Comment on this
Is the proposal concerning the resumption of our proceedings on Tuesday next satisfactory?
Comment on this
Agreed. The House will have read with alarm the reports of the hearing of the Committee of Public Accounts yesterday. Will the Taoiseach allow an emergency debate on the Committee of Public Accounts hearing yesterday regarding Carysfort, or will he and the former Minister for Education continue to duck and dive the question as to whether they gave a directive in relation to Carysfort?
Comment on this
Please, Deputy Mitchell, it must be clear to an experienced Member such as yourself that that matter cannot be discussed today. There are obvious ways and means of raising the matter.
Comment on this
A Cheann Comhairle, may I then seek your advice? The then Minister for Education answered questions in this House on a number of occasions regarding Carysfort. It is clear from the report of the hearing of the Committee of Public Accounts yesterday that this House was misled.
Comment on this
A Cheann Comhairle, if the Deputy is going to make statements here by way of points of order——
Comment on this
I gave no directions and the Deputy would be well advised to stop making these false allegations.
Comment on this
Please, Deputy, that is the end of the matter today. It can be raised again. I must now ask Deputy Mitchell to desist from any further reference to the subject——
Comment on this
May I seek your guidance, Sir. The question I asked the Taoiseach is: will he allow an emergency debate next week in view of the hearing of the Committee of Public Accounts yesterday?
Comment on this
I must press my point in relation to the Order of Business. Will the Taoiseach allow an emergency debate next week in relation to Carysfort in view of the hearing yesterday of the Committee of Public Accounts or will he continue to duck and dive the question?
Comment on this
Deputy Mitchell, you have ignored the fact that I have been on my feet for some time seeking to maintain order.
Comment on this
A Cheann Comhairle, I do think that both the Taoiseach and the former Minister for Education have a case to answer and it is important that the Taoiseach would make a comment on it.
Comment on this
A Cheann Comhairle, I object to the Deputy using the Order of Business to make these ridiculous allegations——
Comment on this
The Deputy has said that the former Minister for Education and I have a case to answer. We have no case to answer.
Comment on this
I am tired of this carry on in this House, of a whole tissue of false allegations particularly by people over there who should be the last to make allegations about anybody.
Comment on this
A Cheann Comhairle, you did not interrupt the Taoiseach. You have to be fair to this side of the House.
Comment on this
A Cheann Comhairle, I am simply making the point to you that the former Minister for Education does appear to have misled this House——
Comment on this
The Deputy will find another time to raise this matter, I am sure. It is not in order now.
Comment on this
I should like to ask the Taoiseach about promised legislation with regard to the Supreme Court judgment yesterday. Will the Taoiseach or the Minister for Justice say when the legislation will be before the House? Can the Minister for Justice confirm that this will affect the interests of spouses who do not now own the family home? Will they be protected?
Comment on this
In regard to that matter can the Taoiseach indicate when the Bill is likely to be published and circulated so that we can ascertain its proposals? Will he say whether the Government have consulted the Attorney General with regard to the constitutional implications and whether the constitutional provisions with regard to property need to be addressed in this context?
Comment on this
That matter has been under examination from all aspects for some time. In fact, as I informed the House on a number of occasions, we were awaiting the Supreme Court decision.
Comment on this
There was no need for the Government to await the Supreme Court decision because it should not have come as a surprise to anybody. May I ask the Taoiseach whether it is intended to allow time in the House next week to discuss the now published, what I understand to be, final report on the Greencore issue, which report the Minister for Industry and Commerce now has. It has been published today in all the papers. Will this House be given time to discuss it and its implications?
Comment on this
The House will be well aware that the Chair has ruled that matters appertaining to Greencore are sub judice.
Comment on this
Sir, the report is published in today's papers and the dogs in the street know what is in the report. Are we in this House not to be allowed to debate its implications? Is there a Government view on what that report contains?
Comment on this
I refer to the schedule of business to be commenced in the House next week and the Bill to enable the privatisation of the B & I Line. Is the Taoiseach aware that the Whips have been asked to enable this matter to be dealt with hastily and put through all Stages before the Christmas recess? This means that the guillotine will be imposed. I would ask the Taoiseach to review this proposal with the Government Whip in view of the unfortunate experiences in the wake of the last rushed privatisation proposition, namely, Greencore.
Comment on this
The Deputy is under a misapprehension. This is not a question of privatisation. What is in mind is the sale of this shipping company.
Comment on this
The Taoiseach and I may disagree as to what is proposed in the Bill but I would ask him to look at the way in which it is proposed to schedule the business with regard to that Bill.