We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna–Questions (Resumed). - Questions 1 to 11 (Resumed).

NTL meetings and Duffy’s advisory role

Summary

Bruton questioned the Cablelink disposal, the Taoiseach’s NTL meetings, and Duffy’s role in circulating a Gaiety memo. The Taoiseach defended Duffy’s cultural-policy work, said no NTL representatives were involved in it, and clarified the three meetings he had attended.

John Bruton Mr. J. Bruton Fine Gael

You allowed Deputy Rabbitte time. Will the Taoiseach agree that the Cablelink contract was one of the most valuable disposals of an asset belonging to the Irish people that has taken place in recent times? Will he agree that if in any other democracy it transpired that an adviser in the Prime Minister's office was closely connected with the consultant to the successful contractor that would be a matter of the gravest concern? Will he accept that a Prime Minister in any other democracy would accept personal responsibility for the omissions and acts of his own personal staff if not at least for more remote official staff? Will he agree he has personally failed in a grievous way in the supervision of his own office in this regard?

Comment on this
Séamus Pattison An Ceann Comhairle Labour Party

The Deputy is going on far too long. If the Deputy continues I will bring the matter to a close.

Comment on this
John Bruton Mr. J. Bruton Fine Gael

There are two more questions I wish to ask.

Comment on this
Séamus Pattison An Ceann Comhairle Labour Party

That is two too many.

Comment on this
John Bruton Mr. J. Bruton Fine Gael

Is it the case that the Taoiseach – if I heard him correctly – met NTL on three occasions: first, in Belfast, second, at a luncheon in La Stampa and subsequently at a meeting? To whom were the minutes of those discussions cir culated? What was Mr. Duffy doing circulating a memo to other Government Departments about the Gaiety Theatre, while he was already an adviser? Is it normal for special advisers in the Taoiseach's Department on their own authority to circulate documents on behalf of the Taoiseach's office?

Comment on this

Dillon's was not, as Deputy Bruton purports to make it, the main drivers of NTL. They were press people who organised press events for Dillon. Dillon, in the case of the contact with Mr. Duffy, was a press person normally associated with his own agency and was not even a Dillon's person. Nobody from NTL was involved in any of the matters in which Mr. Duffy was involved. On the question of what Mr. Duffy was doing on the cultural aspects, he had a particular expertise which is well recognised outside the House. They were looking at useful proposals and he put forward one in connection with opera. It was not a Government memorandum as such. What was the Deputy's last question?

Comment on this
John Bruton Mr. J. Bruton Fine Gael

I asked about the luncheon at La Stampa and so on.

Comment on this

The Deputy has got that all wrong. I did not have lunch in La Stampa. That related to a meeting he had in Dillon's. I had three meetings. I met a met Mr. Lamont who was vice-president of the Belfast Chamber of Commerce in January 1998 when I addressed matters in Northern Ireland on the occasion of the forum when all leaders in the North were invited to a lunch. I addressed the first one. The second was the meeting in my office when all the senior NTL people made a presentation. The third was in Portmarnock, Deputy Owen's constituency, I am sure she was there—

Comment on this

I was not there.

Comment on this

—when the loop around the country was being brought ashore on Portmarnock beach.

Comment on this
Séamus Pattison An Ceann Comhairle Labour Party

That concludes the Taoiseach's Question Time. We must proceed to questions nominated for priority.

Comment on this