We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil

Written Answers - Hearing Impairment Claims.

Emmet Stagg Mr. Stagg Question Labour Party

59 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Defence the number of cases for hearing damage now outstanding; the number of new cases lodged in the past three months; the number of cases for post traumatic stress syndrome which have been lodged; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13692/00]

Comment on this
Theresa Ahearn Mrs. T. Ahearn Question Fine Gael

60 Mrs. T. Ahearn asked the Minister for Defence if he will report on his discussions with the Law Society; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13695/00]

Comment on this
Monica Barnes Mrs. Barnes Question Fine Gael

67 Mrs. Barnes asked the Minister for Defence whether he intends to proceed with the establishment of a tribunal to deal with the deafness compensation cases. [13696/00]

Comment on this
Thomas P. Broughan Mr. Broughan Question Labour Party

71 Mr. Broughan asked the Minister for Defence the progress made in discussions between his Department and lawyers representing soldiers, mediated by the Law Society, regarding a procedure for resolving Army deafness claims; when his Department last met with the Law Society; when he expects these discussions to conclude; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13671/00]

Comment on this
Dinny McGinley Mr. McGinley Question Fine Gael

95 Mr. McGinley asked the Minister for Defence the cost in 2000 of the deafness compensation claims paid by his Department; the legal costs involved; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13714/00]

Comment on this
Michael Smith Minister for Defence (Mr. M. Smith) Fianna Fáil

I propose to take Questions Nos. 59, 60, 67, 71 and 95 together.

After the Supreme Court delivered its judgment on 7 December 1999 in the case of Hanley v Minister for Defence, I wrote to the Law Society of Ireland asking it to act as a channel of communication between the State and the leading plaintiffs' solicitors in Army hearing loss litigation.

Comment on this