Iraq questions ruled out of order
Higgins challenges the ruling that Iraq questions anticipating a debate were out of order. The Chair cites precedent, allows statistical questions and supplementary questions, and directs Higgins to raise concerns about debate time limits with the Whips; Owen notes that replies arrive late.
On a point of order, a Cheann Comhairle, I refer to your ruling questions out of order. Five of my questions dealing with Iraq were ruled out of order in anticipation of statements on the matter following Question Time. If statements on matters of foreign policy are to be confined to ten minutes for spokespersons, it seems unreasonable to disqualify five questions on the basis—
Comment on this
That is in accordance with long-standing precedent regarding questions that anticipate a debate.
Comment on this
One of the Deputy's questions has been allowed because it is purely statistical. Supplementary questions must also be statistical.
Comment on this
I accept that, but where statements follow Question Time I will in future oppose, through the Whips, their confinement to ten minutes.
Comment on this
I take the Deputy's point, but this is not the right time or place to make it. He should take up the matter with the Whips.
Comment on this
Has Question No. 8 been allowed?
Comment on this
Yes, because it is purely statistical. A number of questions relating to Iraq were ruled out of the order because of their anticipatory nature. However, statistical questions seeking information which helps a Deputy to make his or her point in a debate are allowed.
Comment on this
The problem is that we do not receive the replies until 5.30 p.m.