We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Leaders’ Questions.

December negotiations and the British Government paper

Summary

Ó Caoláin asks whether the Governments continued exploring their commitments after the comprehensive agreement failed and whether Britain sent Dublin a paper on the discussions. The Taoiseach says progress depends on answers about criminality and decommissioning, denies that Britain was seeking a deal that permitted either, and says engagement will continue.

Let us get to some specifics. Does the Taoiseach acknowledge that when the effort to get a comprehensive agreement failed, Sinn Féin and the British Government proceeded to explore how the Governments could deliver on the contributions they had made and that this continued up to Christmas? Will he acknowledge that the Government was less than enthusiastic about that? Will he acknowledge that those efforts must continue if we are to get out of this impasse and this exchange of bile? Did the British Government present the Irish Government with a paper on the exchanges from 8 December up to Christmas?

The Taoiseach should make no mistake that my colleagues and I stand here on our mandate received from the Irish electorate and we will continue to represent that electorate. They are not second class citizens and nor are we. We will continue to present a republican challenge to a continued failure on the part of the Taoiseach and his party in ceding responsibility for all public utterances on the most important issue to be addressed in this country today to a Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform who would label Bobby Sands MP a criminal and, by the same criteria, would label as criminals the man whose portrait hangs in the Taoiseach's office and all those who were executed in 1916. That is what the Taoiseach has done and the grassroots of his organisation are saying repeatedly that it is a shame and scandal that he has handed responsibility for the peace process to a man and party who have made zero contribution to it from its inception.

Comment on this

What Deputy Ó Caoláin said at the start of his contribution is correct — we have to move forward. As I said in reply to Deputies Kenny and Rabbitte, what would be enormously helpful in that is the answers to the questions and issues we put yesterday. If we can make progress on those, we can all move forward.

I am always amused at how things change. A few weeks ago I was under some question in this House for being over-generous to Sinn Féin in the comprehensive settlement. Now, a few weeks later matters have moved so differently

Comment on this

Will the Taoiseach answer the question I put to him? Did the British Government provide the Government with a paper?

Comment on this

The Deputy is interrupting because he wants me to answer a question. The question is whether we continued right up until the robbery. The Deputy knows what happened then and what was the British Government's view on the paper then.

Comment on this

More enthusiastic Dublin Government representation has never been seen.

Comment on this

We will continue to try to engage but if the Deputy is trying to say that Prime Minister Blair was trying to make a deal in Christmas week, which allowed criminality or decommissioning to go ahead, that is not the case. The Deputy knows that is not the case and he knows the official who deals with that matter and how let down that official is today.

Comment on this

The Taoiseach should keep sidetracking. He is a master of evasion.

Comment on this