It is proposed to take No. 11, motion re proposed approval by Dáil Éireann for a Council decision on the accession of the European Community to the Hague Conference on Private International Law — back from committee; No.27a, Social Welfare Law Reform and Pensions Bill 2006 — Order for Report and Report and Final Stages; and No. 1, National Sports Campus Development Authority Bill 2006 — Order for Second Stage and Second Stage. It is proposed, notwithstanding anything in Standing Orders, that No. 11 shall be decided without debate; that Report and Final Stages of No. 27a shall be taken today and the proceedings thereon shall, if not previously concluded, be brought to a conclusion at 1.30 p.m by one question, which shall be put from the Chair and which shall, in respect of amendments, include only those amendments set down or accepted by the Minister for Social and Family Affairs; and that on rising today, Dáil Éireann shall adjourn until2.30 p.m on Tuesday, 21 March 2006.

Is the proposal for dealing with No. 11 agreed?

No, it is not agreed. On behalf of the Sinn Féin Deputies, I object to the adoption of this motion without debate. Ireland is already a member of the Hague Conference and, as such, has one autonomous vote in the course of all the conference's proceedings. My colleagues and I are concerned that under this motion, the European Community may usurp this independence on the part of all member states and seek to apply a single European Community vote, thereby undermining the autonomy of the member states of the European Parliament.

My colleague, Deputy Ó Snodaigh, expressed concerns about this proposal when it was considered by the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Justice, Equality, Defence and Women's Rights. He asked a number of pertinent questions about it, none of which was answered by the Minister. As a result of this, there are key questions which have yet to be addressed but which must be teased out. This can only happen in this House, where the questions will receive full and appropriate scrutiny.

Our concern is that this is the second motion relating to the Hague Convention in recent weeks. The Government is adopting a piecemeal approach to adoption issues instead of bringing forward large-scale legislative reform in an area that has been left unchanged for several years. There is an onus on the Government to explain to the House why it is not tabling amendments to the adoption Acts which many people anticipate and only moving as little as possible in obligations under this international treaty.

The Government is proposing that the motion be taken without debate, so I cannot agree with the Deputy. There was a full debate in committee.

I will put the question re the proposal for dealing with No. 11 without debate.

Is the proposal for dealing with item No. 27a. to conclude Report and Final Stages of the Social Welfare Law Reform and Pensions Bill 2006, agreed to?

It is not agreed. I already made the point on more than one occasion that we should not be in the business of guillotining legislation. Rushed law is bad law. There are a whole range of issues to be debated under the Social Welfare Law Reform and Pensions Bill. I am not happy that the Bill will be guillotined by vote at 1.30 p.m. It appears in recent weeks that, on the one hand, the Government wants to remain here until 11 p.m. to make some semblance of progress before there is a mass exodus next week to places all over the world to represent the country and on the other, it wants to bulldoze through this legislation. I object to that.

The Government Whip appeared to have introduced a new regime of not guillotining legislation, which we welcomed. However, he recently appears to be reverting to type and guillotines are now a regular feature.

This Bill did not comply with the normal accepted regulations concerning the introduction of Bills. It was published just one day before going through Second Stage, which is not acceptable. Committee Stage just finished on Tuesday and the spokespersons are being asked to deal with 42 amendments in two hours. This amounts to approximately a minute and a half per amendment, which is not adequate. As it is an important Bill which affects the quality of life of a large number of people, we are asking that it be debated fully until the amendments are dealt with in the normal way. We do not accept the guillotine.

Like other Deputies, the Green Party opposes the guillotining of this Bill, particularly as it is fundamental legislation, with 42 amendments. The amendments were tabled in a considered fashion in the hope that time would be allowed for a debate. By guillotining it and hoping to have the matter dealt with without any fuss, essentially, the Government is making a mockery of Report Stage and the idea of improving the legislation. It results in the Opposition going into a default mode. Only one or two amendments will be dealt with, which does not make the best use of parliamentary time. The Government should ask for Opposition co-operation without a guillotine, which would encourage Members to get through the business and be more productive. This would make better use of parliamentary time. The Government should remove the guillotine.

Following on what can only be described as the debacle of the passage of the Finance Bill through the House earlier in the week, with the guillotine at 11 p.m. and the curtailment of examination and debate, one would have hoped that the appeals of Opposition voices to the Government would have been heard and heeded by those on the Government benches. However, there is repetition once again on a crucial area of legislation, which will have a huge impact on the daily lives of ordinary people. It is very important that the Bill gets the scrutiny it deserves and that it gets the full debate and voice the legislation demands. Therefore, I oppose the imposition of a guillotine which allows very limited opportunity to debate the Bill.

It is precisely to improve the daily lives of people that we want to see this legislation being passed.

Does the Tánaiste think we do not want to do that?

Clearly there are timeframes for both the Finance Bill and the Social Welfare Bill. As many of the issues were debated widely during the budget debate, it is unfortunate that the Government must proceed by way of a guillotine to get the legislation through the House.

Is the proposal that the Dáil, on its rising today, shall adjourn until 2.30 p.m. on Tuesday, 21 March 2006 agreed to?

I do not agree to the proposal that the Dáil adjourn today until Tuesday, 21 March 2006. As I said yesterday, Donna Cleary was murdered in the suburbs of Dublin city. Anarchy rules in parts of the city and its suburbs. Clearly, there is a need for strong, deterring legislation in respect of the gun culture properly identified by the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform. Emergency legislation was introduced in this House on immigration, ground rents and payments in respect of long-stay patients in public hospital beds. Some 20 to 25 sections of the Criminal Justice Bill deal with gun culture. I object to this on the basis the Dáil should meet on next Tuesday and Wednesday. Those Members who will be away all over the world will be very far removed from the anarchy on the streets of this city when they are representing their country.

Hear, hear.

It might pay the Government far better, and we will facilitate it on this side of the House, if it wants to bring in emergency legislation to deal with this issue.

You will fix it all next week.

We have had drunkenness and disorder on the streets of Dublin on St. Patrick's Day in the last number of years. We had riots in this city just a fortnight ago and the danger in communities is palpable. The Government has failed to protect people in the streets and now in their homes. I want the Government to bring in a special 20 section Bill dealing with gun legislation. We will put it through this House next week and send out a very clear message to all of those who——

The Deputy opposed minimum sentences when they were last introduced.

I did no such thing.

I welcome the Minister back to the House. Tá fáilte mhór roimhe. This is the Minister——

Order, please.

This is the Minister who today surmised that Donna Cleary would not have been murdered if the warrant had been executed for the arrest——

Deputy Kenny is convincing nobody and he is making a fool of himself. I suggest he sits down. When the Minister, Deputy O'Donoghue, brought them in the Deputy opposed them. You are a shower of hypocrites.

——of the person alleged to have murdered her. You are the Minister but with your academic snobbery and intelligence you do not know what is happening on the streets.

Frauds. You are a pack of frauds, the lot of you.

The Minister does not know what he is talking about.

Order.

You can surmise all you like. Donna Cleary lies dead.

Deputy Kenny should address the Chair.

You opposed minimum sentences when they came before this House.

For your information Minister, on Monday the Taoiseach said people were getting out after seven years.

Deputy Kenny should address the Chair.

You opposed minimum sentences when they came before the House.

No.

Yes, you did. Read the record.

You opposed them.

Today you claimed nobody gets out within 20 years.

The Minister is a one man law reform commission.

Order, please.

The Minister, Deputy McDowell, made——

I propose, a Leas-Cheann Comhairle, that we all meet here next Tuesday and Wednesday and deal with the legislation the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform has failed to bring through this House.

Hear, hear.

The Minister for outrage. We hear from him often.

Give him a drink of water.

We are being asked to turn St. Patrick's Day into St. Patrick's week, which is unique for most people in this country who expect next Friday to be the only day that is a holiday. This Dáil should start to recognise that outside this House this is completely unacceptable, regardless of the explanations being put out that some Members are going to be on the other side of the world and therefore we all have to mark time.

At Cheltenham.

The reality is that many issues face this country. We heard about the 495 people on trolleys and record levels of problems in the health service. I am sure the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children would appreciate if we were here next week. I ask her to review the situation that is being proposed. With the levels of amnesia on Government benches——

Hear, hear.

——there is every likelihood the Government will forget where the Dáil is if they are off for a week.

It is hypocrisy. The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform——

We need to remind people that this is where the work gets done and this is where people should be attending. To be off for a week is unacceptable. There is no reason for it and we should reject it here and now.

Hear, hear.

Open up the Dáil. We are elected to represent the people, not to be in Cheltenham or America.

I call the Tánaiste.

Does Deputy Carey remember what he told them in the High Court, that we were going to be sitting more——

Deputy Ring will be glad to be in Mayo, in Deputy Kenny's town.

Deputy Ring.

Well we are sitting less since the end of the dual mandate.

I call the Tánaiste.

We should open up the Dáil. That is what we were elected for. We should forget about Cheltenham and America. Does Deputy Carey remember what he told them in the High Court? I will get it for him. I will tell him exactly what he told them in the High Court.

Order, please.

He said he will be sitting more, well we are sitting less since the end of the dual mandate.

The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform is the most deserving.

Deputy Ring, order, please. I call the Tánaiste.

A Leas-Cheann Comhairle——

Does Deputy Carey remember what he told them? I will get it for him.

Enda always had a non-runner.

He said what the Government told him to tell them, that we would be sitting on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday.

Deputy Ring is out of order.

We will not even be sitting on the days we should be sitting.

He will have a heart attack.

I suppose Deputy Davern will be going to Cheltenham.

No, but I was in favour of keeping Ballinrobe open as well.

Ballinrobe only operates on a Sunday and you would not go on a Sunday. You only go when the Dáil is sitting.

Order, please. I call the Tánaiste.

The Deputy is wrong.

We could do a donkey derby.

As Members are aware, it has been a long tradition——

Cheltenham.

——including when Deputy Kenny was a Minister, for members of the Government to join Irish groups and associations in various parts of the world——

What about the rest of us?

We did not have people being shot in the streets. They were different times.

——around our national feast day to help to promote this country's business and tourism.

Hear, hear.

That was before the Internet.

It has been highly successful for many years.

Hear, hear.

St. Patrick's Day is on Friday.

Maybe we could bring in the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform.

I said to Deputy Kenny yesterday the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform will be bringing forward legislation in the next two weeks or so in regard to the issues he raised.

He would want to bring forward something to control himself.

As many Ministers are going to Cheltenham next week, I would like them to undertake some exercise by walking up the steps. As a teller, therefore, under Standing Order 69 I propose that the vote be taken by other than electronic means.

As Deputy Kehoe is a teller, under Standing Order 69 he is entitled to call a vote through the lobby.

I ask the Tánaiste to comment on and clarify a matter. It is deplorable that more than 500 people were on trolleys and chairs yesterday due to overcrowding in hospitals. When the Tánaiste became Minister for Health and Children she made a commitment to deal with overcrowding within months and published a ten-point plan, which is now in tatters. Is it not the case that in October 2004, when 180 people were on trolleys, the establishment of a similar task force, including a plan to deal with accident and emergency departments over an 18-month period, was proposed to the interim Health Service Executive? If the proposal had been accepted, we would be 18 months further on than the task force the Tánaiste now proposes to establish.

In respect of No. 56 on the legislative programme, what definite objectives and targets will the Government achieve in the foreseeable future to deal with the scandalous and appalling situation of 500 people being left on trolleys and chairs in hospitals throughout the country? It is scandalous that nurses, patients and doctors face the kinds of pressures reported in today's newspapers.

On the same issue, I ask the Tánaiste if she recognises these words:

People will judge our health services by accident and emergency services... I expect real and measurable improvements to take place in the coming months in the delivery of accident and emergency services... Accident and emergency departments form a litmus test for me, the Government and the people...

They were spoken by the Tánaiste on 26 January 2005 when the problem, bad as it was, had not reached anything like the level to which it has since sunk. The Tánaiste will have seen figures in this morning's newspapers which show we have reached the worst position ever. Overcrowding is no longer concentrated in a small number of hospitals but scattered throughout the country's hospitals, with just short of 500 people on trolleys. Patients are being fed at the entrance to toilets and accommodated in a fashion which is not acceptable in a civilised society.

The picture is worse now than when the Tánaiste launched her ten-point plan in November 2004. It is a crisis and while I am not predisposed to doing so, I would be minded to ask for her resignation were she not the pick of the clapped out group of burnt out Ministers who accompany her on the Government side. This matter must be addressed. Setting up another task force and using more verbiage and rhetoric when people are being accommodated without dignity in uncivilised circumstances and staff are unable to provide the kind of care they would like to give is unacceptable. This is the lowest point we have reached in nine terrible years of the Government's management of the health service.

Almost 500 people are lying on trolleys in appalling conditions in what is, according to the Government, one of the wealthiest countries in the world. On taking office as Minister for Health and Children, the Tánaiste told us she would deal with the crisis in accident and emergency services and, as the previous speaker noted, stated this would be the litmus test of her tenure in office. She established the Health Service Executive to deal with the accident and emergency crisis but it has worsened. She also stated she wanted to deliver a world-class health system. The position in hospitals throughout the country shows that the health system, far from being world-class, is worse than that of a Third World country. It is appalling.

When will the Tánaiste recognise that the problem is one of capacity? The experts have told us that more acute and community care beds are needed but the Tánaiste has not delivered on her promises in this regard. It is time she delivered although I do not believe she will be able to do so before the next general election. The electorate will have to judge her on her handling of the accident and emergency crisis, an issue on which she has lost the plot and is out of her depth. I hope that instead of establishing another task force she will inform the House of her proposals to deliver extra beds.

The Tánaiste is presiding over an escalating crisis in our hospitals. The Irish Nurses Organisation has called on the Cabinet sub-committee on health to meet to address this crisis. Has the Tánaiste arranged for such a meeting to take place? It is the least that should happen. With a Cabinet sub-committee in place, we do not need further task forces or what can only amount to a token effort and charade but real action to address the current crisis. In November 2004, when launching her ten-point plan, the Tánaiste stated: "Our ten accident and emergency actions will help patients and their families well beyond the accident and emergency departments". The reality of the past week was that people were unable even to access some accident and emergency departments. It was not only an issue of beds but of people who could not even get trolleys. It is absurd in this Ireland of plenty people are suffering within the health system.

Now is the time to concretely address this issue. Additional capacity of in excess of 2,500 beds is needed to resolve the problem but nobody should say that is not achievable. In my community, a situation arose recently in which 26 beds were removed and photographs in my local newspaper revealed they were dumped at the side of the hospital building. That is incredible but it is the reality. It is time for the Tánaiste to take back the reins of responsibility because she cannot continue to wash her hands of blame like Macbeth. She is the Minister and the people expect her to take responsibility and to act accordingly.

On the same issue——

There is no provision for a debate on the Order of Business.

With the indulgence of the Leas-Cheann Comhairle, I wish to raise one further point which the Tánaiste may wish to address in her response.

No.

It can be seen from the figures published yesterday——

A brief question please.

——that Wexford General Hospital had 35 people on trolleys. Only 21 beds——

We cannot discuss each general hospital.

Why not?

May I finish my sentence? Some 21 beds have been provided.

It is not in order on the Order of Business.

Pay a bit of respect to the rules of the House.

The Minister from County Kerry may be satisfied with his hospital but we are not in County Wexford.

They are so smug over there, they do not want to hear anything.

The Minister of State at the Department of Communications, Marine and Natural Resources, Deputy Browne, who is sitting behind the Tánaiste, is aware of the issue because we met with hospital staff last week and jointly promised to raise to raise the issue here. I keep my promises to the people of County Wexford.

Hear, hear.

Some 21 beds will be provided but 35 people are on trolleys. When they are provided, they will not even address the current shortages. I ask the Tánaiste——

The Minister for zero beds.

There should be zero tolerance.

Order, please.

——who I genuinely respect, to take charge of this because the HSE's view——

The first Labour Party leader never to be a Minister.

It is not in order to have a debate on the Order of Business.

While the Minister from County Kerry may think it a laughing matter that people are on trolleys, I can tell him the general public disagrees.

It is a most serious matter.

The Tánaiste to respond.

On the same issue——

I have to speak because——

The Deputy is totally out of order.

——a man has been waiting for a bed in Mayo General Hospital since last Thursday. His consultant in Castlebar thinks he should be in hospital in Galway for a consultant haematology bed. The consultant haematologist in Galway, Dr. Dwyer, wants to accept him but no beds have been available since Thursday. This man is 77 years of age and is now dying of advanced anemia. Even if a bed is provided for him today, he will not be able to take advantage of it because hospital staff believe he has become unfit for travel. These are real problems——

I ask the Deputy to resume his seat.

——and real people. I am sorry for speaking on this matter but parliamentary questions should be asked throughout the summer so that we can deal with these ongoing problems because shortages of beds do not simply go away during Dáil recesses. Yesterday, there were 17 beds in UCHG and 12 in the urgent hospital——

I remind Deputies that they are using up the time allocated to the Social Welfare Law Reform and Pensions Bill.

——yet this man cannot find a bed.

I promise to be brief. I do not want to be specific, although 49 people remain on trolleys in Cork. Does the Tánaiste believe the crisis has reached such a stage that it is now imperative for her to introduce a Supplementary Estimate to deal with it? I accept we should travel abroad on St. Patrick's Day but, given that desperately ill people are being cared for on trolleys and chairs, the last thing the Tánaiste should do this week is leave the country. Does she seriously intend to depart the country despite the crises in the health service? Will she deal with this appalling situation now rather than leave it to Professor Drumm, who clearly does not accept the argument that capacity is at the heart of the matter?

The Deputy promised to be brief.

On the same issue, the hospital in Naas has 24 patients on trolleys, which represents the lowest number there for a considerable time. The hospital is in a state of chaos, even though two wards are idle and await the Tánaiste's sanction to tender for work on them. The plans are in place and I appeal to her to intervene directly in this matter.

Right across the board, the privatisation of cleaning services in hospitals has resulted in dirty hospitals. That also needs to be addressed.

Allow the Tánaiste to respond.

On the same issue——

On the same issue——

There are plans in place to which the Minister merely needs to give her sanction.

There is no provision for a debate on this matter.

Of course there is. The Tánaiste is here to provide an explanation.

There is no provision for debate on the matter.

For example, there is a medical assessment unit——

It is not a debate. We are asking questions.

Doctors have stopped referring people to hospital because they know that only trolleys are available.

One cannot even get on a waiting list in County Wexford.

I call on the Tánaiste.

It is a scandal.

The Deputies are completely out of order.

The Tánaiste should tell us exactly what she is going to do and when she is going to do it.

I support that.

We have been hearing about this issue for the past year and longer, yet nothing is happening on the ground to make a difference to patients on trolleys.

It is getting worse.

Will the Tánaiste tell us whether the people who are waiting to be put on waiting lists will form part of the statistics being compiled by the Health Services Executive? When will we see the official waiting lists which seem to have been buried behind a wall of secrecy? There should be three categories, the first two comprising those waiting for surgery and outpatient appointments. The third list, which is as long as my arm, should consist of people awaiting outpatient appointments.

Can the Tánaiste properly explain why people in Counties Longford and Westmeath had to wait nine and a half years for 103 additional beds in Mullingar General Hospital? Is not the root cause of the problem the failure to provide beds?

That is right.

That is why people are in corridors and on trolleys. It is a disgrace. Members of the Government arrive for photograph opportunities, then disappear like snuff at a wake. Staff, including nurses, attendants and ambulance drivers, are left to carry the can for this Government. It is time for it to stop engaging in its hypocritical cant.

I was asked by Deputy Kenny about legislation to establish the Health Information and Quality Authority. On Tuesday, the Government approved the heads of that Bill and it is being published for an eight week period of consultation, which will lead to better debate in this House. It is hoped we will have the full Bill by the summer recess.

Accident and emergency is a priority. Proportionately speaking, we have the same number of beds as the UK, even though our population of over 65s is 11% as against 17%.

That makes no difference. The proportions are the same.

It is not only a matter of capacity but also of how we make use of it. That is why the HSE is working——

The experts do not say that.

Let the Tánaiste answer.

That is the truth.

The Opposition has been heckling for half an hour. Let the Tánaiste answer.

The Tánaiste is blaming everyone in the world except herself.

I am not blaming anybody.

Listen to what the hecklers are saying.

It must be a disease the Progressive Democrats has contracted.

Fascists. Let the Tánaiste answer.

I am more than happy to take responsibility and ensure that problems are addressed. We have trebled the number of accident and emergency consultants, employed 7,500 more nurses in hospitals, opened 1,100 additional beds in four years——

Open the wards.

——and have 2,200 more dental and other medical staff.

The population has increased, however.

The situation is changing. At present, more than 100 beds are closed in our acute system because of the vomiting bug. That represents a considerable loss of capacity.

The Tánaiste will not open them.

More than 100 beds across the country are closed. If we want to hear from an expert, let us listen to Dr. Lane, an accident and emergency consultant in Letterkenny hospital, who agreed there are pressures but believes there is light at the end of the tunnel and that change is taking place.

Give Letterkenny their 70 beds.

However, change will only take place when we deal with issues in each hospital. Tallaght Hospital, which I know well as does Deputy Rabbitte, had a 1.9% increase for the accident and emergency department, and some weeks ago it had a 300% increase in the numbers of people on trolleys. When representatives from the National Hospitals Office went into that hospital and worked with people there, they were able to make dramatic improvements.

Discharge policies vary significantly from hospital to hospital. Unless we use the capacity provided by the taxpayer as effectively as possible, no amount of new beds will ever solve the problem.

Hear, hear.

That is the reality. I hope I have the support——

Why is everybody saying we need more beds in the system?

Not everybody is saying we need more beds in the system.

According to the main experts, it is a capacity problem.

We have provided 1,100 more beds. The issue is also about how the beds are used.

Why are people on trolleys?

The programme for Government agreed by the Progressive Democrats and Fianna Fáil indicated we would have a legal ombudsman. When will legislation be produced and when will the position be established? Two solicitors sitting beside the Tánaiste may not want it, but the public does. When cases are referred to the Law Society, the public does not want it to be a case of solicitors looking after solicitors. We want a legal ombudsman, an independent person to deal with these cases.

Perhaps there should be one for auctioneers as well.

The Minister for Foreign Affairs is here this morning. The Taoiseach and many Ministers will go to America next week, and I ask that they meet a delegation from our Irish citizens abroad who are fighting for a way to allow Irish citizens who are currently illegally in America to remain there. I ask the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he will meet a delegation from these groups. They are Irish citizens who just want to speak to the Minister and explain their plight.

That is not appropriate on the Order of Business.

I would hope the Minister will do this. The least we can do is meet our citizens abroad, even if we cannot do anything else. I ask that the Minister, with the Taoiseach, would make the case on St. Patrick's Day for Irish people who are illegally in America. Australia was treated as a special case, and that country received 10,500 visas last year. We want 30,000 or 40,000 for our Irish illegals.

On the same subject, thousands of Irish people demonstrated in Washington DC yesterday, and their illegal status is the cause of massive trauma in their lives because of the uncertainty of their awful situation. I ask the Tánaiste if the Taoiseach and Minister for Foreign Affairs will bring any fresh proposals to Washington DC in order to have a right for tens of thousands of our people in difficult circumstances to remain and make their lives in the United States, where they have been living for many years.

Considering we are trying to look after our own diaspora, with regard to the relatively few here from the diaspora of other countries——

I ask the Deputy to be brief.

In the forthcoming week, there will be women from the likes of Somalia and Nigeria seeking permission to make lives here for themselves and their children. Will the Tánaiste give some signal to those people, who have been enduring great trauma like our own people in the United States, that they will be allowed to make a future for themselves?

With regard to the legal ombudsman, we will have the legislation this session, and the heads of the Bill were approved by Government some time ago. With regard to undocumented Irish at the rally in Washington DC yesterday, I understand Niall O'Dowd acknowledged the work of the Irish Government in this regard. The Taoiseach and all the Ministers going to America will continue to lobby as forcefully as possible on the matter.

There is now a substantial number of foreigners living in Ireland and having good opportunities.

They are seeking asylum.

We have an asylum process which is fair and reasonable. The law must clearly take its course on the matter.

There is one law for the Irish and another law for other people.

That is a heartless response.

We have heard a lengthy tirade from the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform abusing the Opposition, but when it comes to accounting for his stewardship in this House, he is rarely found.

Hear, hear.

He speaks of being the meat in the sandwich, but the meat is cut from a very hard neck. I wish to ask the Tánaiste about the product from some of this meat.

Looking at the programme for Government produced in 2002 by the Progressive Democrats, we were to have major reform of criminal law laying down uniform guidelines and principles with regard to punishment of offenders. We were to have a law that would radically overhaul fines, and a nationwide indictable crimes court which would reduce the delay between charging and trial. We were to have new legislative provisions to deal adequately with crimes committed by juveniles, including provisions to update sentencing, rehabilitation and training. We were to have powers for the DPP to appeal against lenient sentences in the District Court. These are just a few of the commitments made in the PD manifesto and reflected in the programme for Government which I noted while sitting here listening to the debate about which we have seen nothing in this House in four years.

The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform has come in and abused other Members but he will not deliver on the issues he has committed to. Instead he goes to his office and issues a press statement. There is an issue of accountability. Today, somebody being investigated with regard to a very serious crime in my constituency has walked away from the investigation because of a technicality. This is not acceptable. The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform cannot lecture all those around him, speak of a watershed in the approach to crime, and yet produce a dismal record on relevant commitments made four years ago to tackle some of these issues.

The Deputy has the list of promised legislation and referred to many Bills. There has been much legislation relating to the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform.

I was speaking about those mentioned in the manifesto, none of which are implemented.

There will be substantial legislation over the remaining life of this Government, including the issue mentioned earlier regarding the legal ombudsman and the firearms legislation, which we will have in two weeks. There will be more matters like this. The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform has a large volume of legislation, as the Deputy knows.

It is all crisis stuff.

The people have been abandoned.

Among other things, he is consolidating the Intoxicating Liquor Act 2000 and other matters that have not been previously considered. He has a major programme of reform under way.

He has a large volume, but it is mostly a tirade of abuse.

On the subject of the rabid rant of the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, can the Tánaiste explain if the defamation Bill will come before the House before the end of this session, as promised? Will the Bill contain references regarding defamation made under Dáil privilege? Has the Tánaiste taken the opportunity to talk to her colleague about correcting the Official Report with regard to the statement made by the Minister on 12 December in the House, which subsequently has been shown to have misled the House?

That Bill will be introduced this session.

Will the Tánaiste reply to the second part of my question?

I am not aware of the contents of the legislation and this is not the opportunity to discuss the matter.

The European Commission published its Green Paper on energy, and the OECD has commented similarly. The Deloitte & Touche report has been presented to the relevant Minister. So far, no response on the matter has come from Government. Will the Tánaiste indicate if the Deloitte & Touche report will be published, and if the relevant legislation, the single electricity market Bill, will be brought into the House as early as possible to generate the necessary debate?

It has come to my attention and that of numerous people the number of occasions that Ministers cosy themselves into chat shows in the national broadcasting service. As this is in breach of broadcasting Acts, I wish to inquire——

This is not appropriate to the Order of Business.

The Deputy has been on Vincent Browne's show himself.

I hope the Minister has not been to RTE making representations on behalf of them.

The Deputy will be ringing the Angelus bell next.

Somebody from the Government is clearly making constant contact with the authorities in RTE to impress upon them the need to have Ministers accommodated on soft cosy chat shows to promote Government policy. This is in breach of legislation. The public broadcasting service is not the preserve of Government but of the people. Everybody is entitled to equal treatment. Who has been in touch with RTE?

That question is not appropriate to the Order of Business.

What arrangements have been entered into, by whom, and under what conditions?

The Deputy should try to get on "The Podge and Rodge Show".

The Minister should look after zero tolerance, his legacy to this State.

The question is not appropriate to the Order of Business.

May I have a reply, as there were two questions?

The last question is inappropriate to the Order of Business.

The first question is appropriate.

The energy Bill will be later this year. The Minister and his officials are currently considering the Deloitte & Touche report.

Will the Tánaiste indicate when Committee Stage of the Building Control Bill 2005 will be taken?

I do not know that. I will get back to the Deputy.

Other legislation we await is the Water Services Bill, which has been with the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government for a year but has not yet come before the Select Committee on the Environment and Local Government. What responsibility does the Chief Whip's office have for ensuring that legislation passed on Second Stage in the House is vigorously progressed to Committee Stage? We could deal with it next week.

Normally the line Minister and the committee try to arrange time. I will ask the Minister responsible and the Chief Whip about the Bills in the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government.

In reference to the Tánaiste's authoritative performance yesterday on the location of the children's hospital, am I correct that approximately €41 million has already been spent by Temple Street hospital on the site of the Mater Hospital, which may now be abandoned?