We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil

Written Answers. ›

Afforestation Programme.

James Breen Mr. J. Breen Question Independent

255 Mr. J. Breen asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food if she will increase the premium paid to farmers currently involved in forest plantation in view of the fact that there has not been an increase in this premium over the past six years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36805/06]

Comment on this
Mary Coughlan Minister for Agriculture and Food Fianna Fáil

Following the successful conclusion of the recent Partnership talks, I announced my intention on October 19 to increase the rates of premium paid to landowners participating in the afforestation scheme by 15%. The increase must be formally approved by the European Commission. When this approval is received my Department will take steps to implement the increased premium rates.

Comment on this
James Breen Mr. J. Breen Question Independent

256 Mr. J. Breen asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food if she will provide grant aid for machinery to harvest wood fuel thus ensuring better timber quality in crops which might increase the wood energy sector; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36807/06]

Comment on this
Mary Coughlan Minister for Agriculture and Food Fianna Fáil

My Department is currently examining the possibility of such a scheme, as part of forestry support under the New Rural Development Programme.

Comment on this
Pat Breen Mr. P. Breen Question Fine Gael

257 Mr. P. Breen asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food when a forestry application appeal will be processed for a person (details supplied) in County Clare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [36808/06]

Comment on this
Mary Coughlan Minister for Agriculture and Food Fianna Fáil

An appeal against a decision of my Department in respect of a refusal to approve afforestation grant aid on lands owned by the person in question was received on 1 September 2006. The appeal was fully processed but was not successful. The original decision to refuse approval was upheld on the grounds of landscape environment considerations.

Comment on this