We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna — Questions (Resumed).

EU Council and the Lisbon strategy

Summary

Ó Caoláin raises concerns about the Lisbon strategy, social spending and labour-market flexibility, alongside other European Council issues. The Taoiseach describes the annual process and defends Ireland’s efforts to raise its concerns, including on human rights.

Was the Lisbon strategy discussed at the recent meeting of the EU Council? Is the Taoiseach concerned that the European Commission's annual report on the strategy tries to justify decreases in social welfare spending and insists on further so-called flexibility in the labour market, which would unquestionably be to the detriment of pay and conditions of workers throughout the EU? Was the energy crisis in Europe and the rest of the world discussed at the European Council meeting? Has the Taoiseach at any time raised at EU level Ireland's concerns about the drift-back — in the absence of a better description — towards a reliance on nuclear power as a source of energy? Has Ireland promoted renewable energy as a counter to that? There is evidence that Britain is returning to the bad old days when it relied on the nuclear option.

During his visit to Saudi Arabia, did the Taoiseach raise in a serious way the appalling human rights record of the regime in that country? Is he aware that on Monday of this week Amnesty International issued an urgent action note in relation to Saudi Arabia? The note expressed particular concern about the fate of ten detainees, including university professors, doctors and lawyers, who had been involved in peaceful protests aimed at securing the human rights and dignity of citizens in Saudi Arabia. Did the Taoiseach reflect Irish concerns about the human rights record of Saudi Arabia? Will he act on Amnesty International's latest urgent alert, which relates to specific people who clearly face the prospect of torture and even worse?

Comment on this

The Lisbon Agenda always feeds into the spring meeting of the European Council. Almost the entire spring Council meeting will relate to the Lisbon strategy. Every year we draw up a report for the spring Council meeting on what we did in the preceding year across the range of areas that are set out in the strategy. We will produce a report again this year. After the reports have been discussed on a national basis, the agenda for the following year is set out. The process runs from Easter to Easter, rather than within the calendar year. That will happen again this year.

I have addressed the House previously on the European Union's approach to the energy issue. The entire autumn meeting of the European Council, which was attended by the Russian President, Mr. Putin, involved a discussion on energy. Germany has made energy the key issue of its Presidency, with the proposed European constitution. I reported to the House previously on the matter and answered questions on it. The entire autumn meeting of the Council was devoted to the matter. As energy is a national competency, each country is responsible for its own energy policies. The European Union has no problem with Ireland's energy mix. There is now greater co-operation on issues like the future supply and pricing of energy at EU level. Ireland has its own policies and competency on these issues.

Deputy Ó Caoláin asked me whether I addressed the issue of human rights in a serious manner while I was in Saudi Arabia. We always raise such issues during our overseas missions because people expect it of us, as representatives of this country. We raised them on this occasion. We do not raise such issues in a trenchant fashion by attacking the countries in question, but we outline our concerns strongly. On this occasion, I did that during my various meetings. Perhaps I did so more publicly than I have done on other occasions. During our dialogue with third countries, we always avail of the appropriate opportunities to raise our human rights concerns.

We raise human rights issues not only in political meetings, but also in detail as part of the official contacts during each visit, and we did that on this occasion. Human rights issues are also highlighted in the ongoing dialogue between the European Union and Saudi Arabia. When I raise these matters, I usually do so in the context of the EU, which most countries are used to dealing with. It is clear that Ireland ties itself into the European position.

In my televised keynote address to the King Faisal Foundation in Riyadh, which was attended by many key academics in that city, I stated:

The principle of mutual respect must underpin all aspects of relations between our two regions, Europe and the Middle East, which are inextricably linked by geography, by history and by millennia of cultural and religious interchange. Ireland is a modern and pluralist State. We believe that fundamental human rights are inalienable. At the same time, we accept that it is most effectively through dialogue and co-operation that all states can over time meet the standards to which they have committed themselves as members of the United Nations.

Human rights issues were raised during the question and answer session that followed my speech, which was widely publicised in Riyadh. Deputy Ó Caoláin will appreciate that when one deals with academics in countries like Saudi Arabia, they are quick to speak about the standards of the west — that happened on this occasion — and one ends up defending the human rights record of other EU member states, which is not always the most comfortable position to be in.

Comment on this

I do not think it is something the Taoiseach should defend.

Comment on this

That is the trouble with these issues, as the Deputy can understand. One has to do one's best in such circumstances. When I raised our concerns about human rights, it was clear what I was doing. That is why I got it back on the other side as well.

Comment on this