One of the hallmarks of the Government has been inconsistency and confusion. One of the national newspapers refers today to the latest U-turn in respect of water charges for schools as being a Pontius Pilate programme that has turned into a water pilot programme.

Who writes this stuff?

Following the confusing statement put up by the Minister for Education and Science on her departmental website, the Taoiseach should clear up a few simple matters for Members. Yesterday, the Taoiseach conceded that it was his intention to introduce a flat rate of payment for water usage in schools. He stated that he intended to introduce a transition period. Can the Taoiseach explain the basis on which the size of schools will determine the flat rate? Will it be based on usage of water or on a per capita attendance at schools?

Does the transition period only apply until the end of 2009? Given that the Government negotiated a derogation to the framework water directive in the first instance, will schools be obliged to pay for water they receive from 2010, on the basis of either an allocation given free and a charge applying thereafter or a continuation of the flat rate? I refer to schools that have received bills this week, many of which have received bills for water and sewerage charges combined. When the Taoiseach says that such schools should hold those bills, what is the position in respect of the discharge of such charges? In other words, will they be obliged to pay charges at all or will they be obliged to pay an element of them in a flat rate? Alternatively, can they dispose of them in the wastepaper bin?

Twenty minutes before the Taoiseach made his comments in the House yesterday, officials of the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government were saying that it would be completely impractical to introduce a flat rate charge for water in schools and that it would be impossible. The Taoiseach either showed leadership or desperation and I am unsure which. People are very confused about the outcome of his statements and he should clear up this issue for me.

Under the heading, "Improved Funding for our Schools", the education section of the programme for Government contains the following commitment: "We will ... examine the provision of waste and water allowances to school, with charges becoming effective after these agreed allowances are exceeded." The Minister has explained repeatedly that because of the framework water directive, the Government would work out this commitment between the Departments and would implement it. This is the first time in my memory of implementing programmes for Government that implementing a measure is considered to be a U-turn. This is extraordinary.

The Taoiseach misled the Dáil last week.

I can only come to the logic that if there is not something——

That is on the record.

The Taoiseach, without interruption.

I will never be able to answer Deputy Kenny if Members of the Opposition continue to interrupt.

The Taoiseach must be allowed to make his reply without interruption.

I know that Fine Gael Members are very upset that this measure was included in the programme for Government.

The Taoiseach has been codding the country for long enough.

He is turning water into wine.

I suppose that if this is the logic, implementing something that is not in the programme for Government constitutes total consistency.

They would not understand logic.

It is called nod and wink Government.

I wish to answer Deputy Kenny, if he wants an answer.

The Taoiseach, please.

Given the need to manage the transition to a new system appropriately——

Another U-turn.

——and to enable conservation measures to be implemented to deal with these issues and particularly to conserve our water, with which everyone in the House yesterday was in agreement, the Government is considering the length of a transition period. The length of that period has not yet been decided. While it can be up to the end of 2009, the Government must decide on its length. As I noted yesterday, schools should monitor water usage and institute repairs and conservation measures during this period. There already is support for so doing. The Government also has sought advice from the Attorney General's office regarding the long-term options.

I refer to Deputy Kenny's question regarding the payment to schools of flat rate charges. This would be proportionate to school size as happens at present. I examined the schedule of local authority charges on Monday or yesterday morning. While such local authority charges differ nationwide, school size is what is used.

I refer to the intentions of the Departments of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government and Education and Science. There are a number of issues, some of which were raised in the meeting yesterday of the Joint Committee on Education and Science. Some were raised by the Minister and others have been sent in from schools in recent weeks. The Government's intention is to draw up a single comprehensive statement and release it after Christmas. The schools will not return until 7 January.

However, they will receive their bills.

As the Deputy is aware, they will not be there over the Christmas holidays, unless things changed this year.

The Taoiseach may not be there for that long either.

Would it happen if the Taoiseach had his way?

The statement will be released before their return.

The Taoiseach should mind himself.

Moreover, the Cabinet will meet on 4 January, before the schools return, and will deal with these issues. Yesterday and the day before I looked into the number of schools that have received large bills and not many have received such bills.

How many?

Very few.

Approximately how many?

The Taoiseach should have a shot at it.

Not many. In the case of a number of schools that had received such bills during the year, they had been negotiated downwards with the local authorities. Others that received quite large bills were the result of arrears. I detect that Members are not really interested in the details. However, we will work it out.

What details?

The Taoiseach should give Members the details.

What about the refund?

We will work it out and implement our programme for Government in a highly satisfactory manner.

Deputy Kenny has a supplementary question.

I certainly will allow the Taoiseach to give the details contained in his briefing note. The schools and parents want to know the detail because the Taoiseach's latest statement does not add to their store of knowledge about their position. Must schools that received bills of between €500 and €10,000 hold on to those bills or dump them? Will they be paying a flat charge from 1 January? If so, how is it to be computed on the basis of school size? What will the flat charge be for a 40-pupil country school in Caherciveen as opposed to one in Kildare that is bursting at the seams? Will the Department of Education and Science negotiate with the local authority between now and the end of January on the flat rate? Will schools that have already paid their bills receive a refund over and above the flat rate the Taoiseach intends to introduce for the transition period? This refund could be used for many facilities in those schools.

Given that the framework directive requires the use of financial incentives so individuals, from pupils to adults, can understand the importance of water conservation, with which concept they generally agree, what system will be introduced by the Government from 2010? Will the flat rate be abolished and will a generous allowance be given to every school above which a charge will apply? Can we take it that all these questions will be dealt with when the House resumes at the end of January 2008?

In the past six months, we have had leadership by the worst Government in the past 40 years. It has lurched from crisis to crisis, including those involving provisional licences, cancer scares, the inability to publish reports and the acceptance of huge pay increases by the Government. As the Taoiseach might say, we are not going to play "smokes and daggers" with this. There have been climbdowns every day. I heard the Minister of State at the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment, Deputy John McGuinness, say an hour ago that he does U-turns every day and the Government is quite prepared to do U-turns every day. The signs are that this is the case.

A Freudian slip.

I thank the Taoiseach for the beautiful card he sent me of the orchid, which states "Mo chara — Bertie Ahern". "Mo chara", as the Taoiseach knows, means "My friend" and the Taoiseach knows the definition of a friend these days.

The Deputies are all just jealous.

The inside track.

The same orchid was titled ARANDA Ishbel Manisaki. Its first date of pollination was 20 November 1996 and its date of first flowering was 19 March 2002.

Will the Taoiseach answer the questions on the flat rates and the transition periods and state what system will be in place beyond 2010? Perhaps this time the Taoiseach will not step out of the frying pan into the fire.

Who writes this stuff?

Who wrote that?

I was hoping Deputy Kenny would mention a hugely successful budget, a good legislative programme and a considerably higher employment rate.

The legislative programme.

I hoped he would mention the continued development of our health service and education system and congratulate the Government on implementing its programme for Government.

We will not even mention his record.

He is not waving; he is drowning.

An Taoiseach, without interruption.

We are fully committed to the implementation of the water framework directive, as I stated yesterday. It is appropriate and necessary for conserving water as a national resource and it was agreed with the European Union in 2003. In a number of areas, there is a phase-in period and an implementation period. If the measure were just implemented on a usage basis in all schools, they would have very large bills and this is why we included a clause in the programme for Government on how we would work to introduce a system with a flat rate and how, at the same time, work to ensure the conservation of water. Even if it were possible to have a flat rate for everybody — one cannot because local authorities have different bases for charging — there would be no incentive for schools to conserve water. There are pilot schemes in many schools and these have shown how much water the schools can conserve. This is good and proper.

We cannot just have a flat rate after 2010, whereby one would have one's bill paid, regardless of the amount of water one uses and even if one takes no interest in conservation.

No one is suggesting it.

Nobody was asking for that.

I am just answering Deputy Kenny's questions. We are endeavouring to ascertain, with the local authorities, the basis on which we can operate. Let me give an example. On the basis of information supplied by the authorities — they did not all supply it — the combined charge for water and waste water services across local authorities varied from 0.99 cent/cu.m. to 2.62 cent/cu.m. and the average was 1.74 cent/cu.m. A school in Caherciveen could have a very low cost and an understanding with the local authorities. Most of the 4,000 schools in the Republic have quite low charges. Some of the schools that have had high costs this year accrued them because of remedial work or leaks. One school that had a bill of €6,000, spent €500 on repairs and thereby reduced its bill to just over €1,000. There is a variety of reasons and we must work out a fair system.

It seems to us that the fairest system involves a flat rate attached to which there would be some kind of incentive to conserve water. Some schools admitted in their letters that their water supplies are left on for the entire summer, thus increasing their bills. This issue is not too difficult to resolve, as teachers point out themselves. I heard a teacher state this morning that his school is twinned with a school in France, but he did not say that all the citizens in France pay a very expensive domestic water charge.

Domestic.

It is domestic. Parents of pupils in Ireland are not paying this. That is the key issue.

Parents here must pay for photocopying paper in schools.

We know that.

We will have to give the children a bottle of water going to school so they can flush the toilet.

Deputy Kenny should note that a list of issues has been made available several months ago.

What does Deputy Finian McGrath think?

What about the refund?

I hope to be able to issue one comprehensive statement as early as I can have it agreed. I have asked officials to meet over the next few days to try to have it finished before Christmas. We will try to clear it at the Government meeting on 4 January.

What about the refund?

I call Deputy Gilmore.

No refund.