We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Order of Business

Defined-benefit pension protections

Summary

Kevin Humphreys asks for legislation changing pension-priority rules before imminent scheme wind-ups harm contributors. The Taoiseach says the issue is technically complex, involves the Waterford Glass case before the European Court, and remains under review.

Pensions legislation was to be introduced to change the priority of pensioners' benefit following the winding up of defined benefit schemes. It was to effect change regarding the 100% priority given to pensioners, allowing for a better return to existing and former employees who have not yet retired. I have been contacted by a number of people who face the winding up of their pension funds on 2 May after having made contributions to the funds for over 20 years. They face circumstances in which only 20% of their funds will be left. Legislation was promised to balance this out, especially given what happened with Waterford Glass. What is the current position on the legislation? Unfortunately, it will not come through quickly enough for the people who are to see their defined benefit pension schemes wound up on 2 May.

Comment on this
Enda Kenny The Taoiseach Fine Gael

I understand the case of the defined benefit private pension scheme is before the European Court of Justice. Obviously, this will take its course in respect of the Waterford Glass case. With regard to pensions legislation generally, the matter is being examined in detail. It is technical and complex. The Minister must receive the advice of the Attorney General. We shall update the House as progress is made.

Comment on this