Banking inquiry party whip
Peter Mathews demands confirmation that Government members will not be whipped during the banking inquiry and argues that two amendments are vital to its transparency. The Ceann Comhairle rules the matter outside the Order of Business and repeatedly ends the intervention.
I refer to the Houses of the Oireachtas (Inquiries, Privileges and Procedures) Act 2013, which makes provision for the Oireachtas joint committee undertaking a banking inquiry. Will the Taoiseach confirm what he said a few days ago, that there will be no whip imposed at any stage and in any-----
Comment on this
No. This is not concluded business.
Comment on this
Of course it is. We are dealing with promised legislation. The Bill has gone through.
Comment on this
The Taoiseach said there would be removal of the whip in regard to the banking inquiry because he wants a full, open, transparent and honest inquiry. Unless the starting point of this inquiry is without the whip-----
Comment on this
There were two amendments to the motion the Government put forward and the Taoiseach whipped his own party and the Labour Party to put down those two amendments which are highly relevant to the openness, honesty, truthfulness and transparency of this inquiry. I am putting it to the Taoiseach if he is a man of courage and leadership he will do exactly that, nothing more and nothing less.
Comment on this
It is. The Taoiseach said this to the nation on television and in the media. He should answer.
Comment on this
The Taoiseach has the initiative to answer that question.
Comment on this
The Taoiseach should get those two amendments passed. He should re-present them to the House. They are on the Order Paper.