We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Questions on Promised Legislation

Mandatory retirement age bill

Summary

Deputy John Brady seeks a money message for a Bill to abolish mandatory retirement age, arguing workers are being forced onto jobseeker's payment. The Taoiseach says he has not seen the request but notes there is no mandatory retirement age, only contract-based retirement rules.

Pat the Cope Gallagher An Leas-Cheann Comhairle Fianna Fáil

Deputy Brady, we are following the example of Deputy Jan O'Sullivan.

Comment on this

As we sit here this afternoon, many are being forced into taking retirement against their will. Not only are they forced into retirement, they are forced onto a jobseeker's payment which is grossly unfair. The Taoiseach will be well aware that in February last a Bill came before this House to abolish the mandatory retirement age. It has gone through pre-committee scrutiny. We are waiting on a money message from the Taoiseach. When will that money message be delivered because it is grossly unfair that people are being forced into taking retirement against their will and onto a jobseeker's payment? When will the money message come and will the Taoiseach commit to abolish the mandatory retirement age?

Comment on this
Leo Varadkar The Taoiseach Fine Gael

I will have to check that out. It is not to say it is not in the system, but I have not seen the request come across my desk yet for a money message on that Bill. It is important, once again, to state that there is no mandatory retirement age in Ireland. People are free to work well into their 60s, 70s and 80s, if they so wish, and many do.

Comment on this

Clearly, not many.

Comment on this
Leo Varadkar The Taoiseach Fine Gael

However, sometimes employment contracts require workers to retire from a particular job and, obviously, changing somebody's employment contract can be difficult to do in law.

Comment on this