Water referendum and refunds
Deputy Collins urged a referendum to protect public ownership of water, citing Slovenia, and the Taoiseach dismissed the need and cost of such a vote. Subsequent interruptions about waste, refunds, and constitutional powers were procedural or reactive only.
The Taoiseach has stated he does not see the urgency for a referendum on the public ownership and management of our water. There is a visiting delegation from Slovenia, which last year introduced a change to its constitution to ensure its water resources remain in public ownership. This is not because of a direct threat but rather so that in future big corporations would not have an interest in its citizens' water. I advise the Taoiseach to perhaps have a chat with the delegation about that while they are here. He could get some good advice from them.
Comment on this
The matter is working its way through the House, as the Deputy is aware. I do not see the urgency in it. I do not know how Slovenia changes its constitution but in Ireland, a referendum is required. Even if it is not a standalone question, the cost of carrying out the referendum would be between €10 million and €12 million. I know it is a core principle of socialism to waste as much taxpayers' money as possible but there are so many ways one could spend €12 million than on a wasteful and pointless referendum.
Comment on this
The Taoiseach knows how to waste money.
Comment on this
What about the refunds for the water debacle?