Skellig Michael and road safety remarks
Deputy Eamon Ryan raised damage to monuments and Skellig Michael, then the discussion drifted into side remarks about birds and road safety. The Taoiseach answered the later exchange by saying road-safety legislation was being advanced for broader reasons.
There are 120,000 recorded monuments in the country, and only 1,000 of them are owned by the State. The vast majority are not accessible and are not cared for in a proper way. Perhaps the biggest example of that is recent evidence from independent experts which has been presented to our party's Senator Grace O'Sullivan, showing the damage done to Skellig Michael in recent years. Damage has been done both to the wildlife, despite it being a special protected area for bird life, and also to the physical archaeology there.
The only interest Fine Gael seems to have in heritage matters is in progressing the Heritage Bill 2016, which it has placed before the Dáil. That Bill is about burning our uplands and cutting our hedges in a way that threatens wildlife. Could the Taoiseach hold that Bill back at this stage and recognise that it is a deeply flawed piece of legislation? Instead of forcing it through, could he introduce a heritage Bill which actually develops and protects our natural heritage sites in a cohesive and comprehensive way? Why is the Taoiseach burning and cutting up our heritage rather than protecting it, which is what he should be doing?
Comment on this
Briars are also burnt out on the road.
Comment on this
I am not sure what is the connection between Sceilig Mhichíl and that particular legislation.
Comment on this
The birds are not so foolish as to be on the side of the road.
Comment on this
One would have a hard time setting fire to the birds on Sceilig Mhichíl. I guarantee it.