Judicial Appointments Commission Bill
Deputy O'Brien challenged the Judicial Appointments Commission Bill, citing opposition from Fianna Fáil and concerns raised by the European Commission. The Tánaiste said the Bill is progressing, reflects the programme for Government, and will be revisited on Report Stage.
I ask Members to be concise so that we can give everyone a chance. I am obliged to call leaders or their representatives first.
Comment on this
I wish to ask about the Judicial Appointments Commission Bill, which has been described in today's editorial in The Irish Times as the pet project of the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport, Deputy Ross. I concur with that view. As the Tánaiste knows, Fianna Fáil is opposed to the Bill because it is fundamentally flawed, but if the Government is not going to listen to us, we are not the only ones who have concerns with it. The European Commission has expressed its concern that the Bill "would not be in line with European standards". The Tánaiste will agree that this comment is not insignificant. It cannot and should not be ignored. Is the Government concerned about the Commission's view and, in order that Ireland can meet the highest standards of judicial independence, will it reconsider this legislation, which is being driven by the Minister, Deputy Ross?
Comment on this
The question is in order, as it relates to the Judicial Appointments Commission Bill.
Comment on this
As the Deputy knows, the Bill is going through the system at the moment. It has been through Committee Stage. There are a series of issues with it, given its legal complexity and the amendments that have been made, some of which were supported by the Opposition and others of which were not. Of course the Government notes what the European Commission says. This is not driven by one Minister. This forms part of the programme for Government.
Comment on this
He would be better off concentrating on transport.
Comment on this
A decision has been made by the Government that we need to make a fundamental change in terms of judicial appointments. We must ensure that, on a new body that is set up to make recommendations to the Government, there will be a lay majority. That is not inconsistent with what many other countries in the EU have done, including our closest neighbours.